FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

`functools.partial` docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" by rodrigogiraoserrao · Pull Request #113675 · python/cpython · GitHub

  1. python
  2. cpython

Repository navigation

functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" - #113675

Merged
AlexWaygood merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
rodrigogiraoserrao:patch-2
Jan 3, 2024
ConversationCommits (1)ChecksFiles changed
Merged

functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable"#113675
AlexWaygood merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
rodrigogiraoserrao:patch-2

Conversation

rodrigogiraoserrao commented Jan 3, 2024 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes a typo in the last paragraph of the docs on partial objects, https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html#partial-objects

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--113675.org.readthedocs.build/

bedevere-app Bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news awaiting review labels Jan 3, 2024

Eclips4 commented Jan 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Per https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/referencable this doesn't looks as a typo.
cc @AlexWaygood as a english native speaker

AlexWaygood approved these changes Jan 3, 2024
View reviewed changes

AlexWaygood left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)

AlexWaygood added needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes needs backport to 3.12 only security fixes labels Jan 3, 2024
AlexWaygood changed the title Fix typo in docs about partial objects functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" Jan 3, 2024
AlexWaygood merged commit 4de468c into python:main Jan 3, 2024

miss-islington-app Bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks @rodrigogiraoserrao for the PR, and @AlexWaygood for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

bedevere-app Bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-113677 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

bedevere-app Bot removed the needs backport to 3.12 only security fixes label Jan 3, 2024

bedevere-app Bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-113678 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

bedevere-app Bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Jan 3, 2024
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "reference…
8440da2 
…able" (pythonGH-113675)

(cherry picked from commit 4de468c)

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "reference…
2fa2316 
…able" (pythonGH-113675)

(cherry picked from commit 4de468c)

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>

Eclips4 commented Jan 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)

We also have at least three similar situations: c-api/weakref.rst (38 and 50 lines) and newtypes.rst (548 line). Should we fix it?

AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
[3.12] functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "re…
c267901 
…ferenceable" (GH-113675) (#113677)

`functools.partial` docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" (GH-113675)
(cherry picked from commit 4de468c)

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>
AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
[3.11] functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "re…
3a9bf03 
…ferenceable" (GH-113675) (#113678)

`functools.partial` docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" (GH-113675)
(cherry picked from commit 4de468c)

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>

AlexWaygood commented Jan 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We also have at least three similar situations: c-api/weakref.rst (38 and 50 lines) and newtypes.rst (548 line). Should we fix it?

If you make a PR, I'll probably merge it -- but also, I wouldn't say it's a priority, since both are acceptable spellings :)

rodrigogiraoserrao commented Jan 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Merriam-Webster and the Oxford Learner's Dictionary seem to disagree, https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/referencable & https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/spellcheck/english/?q=referencable

I won't push more than this, though, as I'm not a native speaker.

kulikjak pushed a commit to kulikjak/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "reference…
c58d6d5 
…able" (python#113675)
aisk pushed a commit to aisk/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "reference…
64ec8db 
…able" (python#113675)
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "reference…
4ac88aa 
…able" (python#113675)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

AlexWaygood AlexWaygood approved these changes
rhettinger Awaiting requested review from rhettinger rhettinger is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL