FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

gh-126782: Support qualified referencing for `ntpath.abspath()` by nineteendo · Pull Request #119849 · python/cpython · GitHub

/ cpython Public

gh-126782: Support qualified referencing for ntpath.abspath() - #119849

Closed
nineteendo wants to merge 12 commits into
python:mainfrom
nineteendo:fix-ntpath.abspath
Closed

gh-126782: Support qualified referencing for ntpath.abspath()#119849
nineteendo wants to merge 12 commits into
python:mainfrom
nineteendo:fix-ntpath.abspath

Conversation

nineteendo commented May 31, 2024
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

nineteendo changed the title gh-119826: Improve accuracy of `ntpath.normpath() & ntpath.abspath() gh-119826: Improve accuracy of ntpath.normpath() & ntpath.abspath() May 31, 2024
nineteendo marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 13:34
nineteendo changed the title gh-119826: Improve accuracy of ntpath.normpath() & ntpath.abspath() gh-119826: Support qualified referencing for ntpath.abspath() Jun 2, 2024

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I never rebase, when I force push it's to redo a merge commit which failed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I'll fix the drive relative paths in a separate PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Two notes:

  • Please don't change the target issue after the PR has been opened, it makes it harder to track discussion.
  • I'd really prefer that this PR get closed and reopened as a fresh PR under the new issue. Incorrectly rebasing triggers a review from all the codeowners, and they don't get unsubscribed even after their review request is removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry for the chaos.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It wasn't a rebase, I made a merge commit locally, but I realised I forgot to add the generated code. So I reset my head and committed without restarting the merge, causing the reviews to be requested. I force pushed afterwards to revert this commit in the hope it would remove the reviews (it didn't) with the intention of trying again.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL