| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityWould autoconf be smart enough if we were to just use AC_CHECK_LIB for dladdr1 as we did for dlopen in that it wouldn't readd the -ldl flag or is it the only way to write these extra checks?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityHonestly, I don't know - I know enough autoconf to get by, but not much more.
Unfortunately, I don't have ready access to a development platform that would use the dladdr1 check (at least, I don't think I do), so it's difficult for me to experiment with this.
My concern would be whether it would add the flag to LIBS or LDFLAGS though - if it's added to LIBS, we'll be back in the same situation as before. Based on what I'm seeing in other AC_CHECK_LIB usage, it looks like it would get added to LIBS by default, and any strategy that got it into LDFLAGS would essentially be no better than AS_VAR_APPEND.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI see. Let's keep it that way (it works, it's a bit fragile, but we'll manage if there are issues in the future)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.