| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI think this shouldn't be a comparison. If we're calling single-phase “legacy” (which finally seems to be the cunsensus), then this section should describe what modules are, and the single-phase section should describe the eldritch weirdness of that method.
Should I try to reword it that way? (I'd like to avoid merge conflicts.)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThere is existing mention of single-phase as 'legacy', though admittedly in a niche location: https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#c.PyInterpreterConfig.check_multi_interp_extensions
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality@encukou feel free to push to this branch.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.