| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityDo we really need this? It looks like type codes match, when same data type is present (and not an alias).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThey match, and I'd like to keep it that way.
I'd like to add this note, for a very specific case: when adding a new one (in stdlib or a third-party module), it's good to be aware of the others -- and more importantly, of the fact that there are several lists to be aware of.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI see point of doing this for third-party modules, but for stdlib I would rather advocate more simple invariant to keep: struct/array/memoryview should use same type codes. Modulo well documented differences:
I suggest just add references to the struct and the array modules. And a more detailed note about the NumPy.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThat's a good invariant design goal, and I hope these notes will help us do that.
But, I'm assuming most readers want docs for one specific module. For those, readers separate tables are better.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.