Repository navigation
gh-152397: Add note to itertools.chain.from_iterable docs re PEP 798 - #152455
Closed
Twix1288 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Twix1288 wants to merge 1 commit into
Twix1288 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Documentation build overview1 file changed ± library/itertools.html |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
Hmm, I just added a PR for this 20 minutes before this one was posted: #152454. I will add you as a co-contributor on that PR. Stylistically, I prefer the other edit as more terse, factual, and letting the reader make their own comparison/contrast without the docs themselves making a value judgment. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a short note pointing readers to the inline unpacking-in-comprehension form added by PEP 798, as a more readable alternative for simple flattening on Python 3.15+.
Closes #152397