Repository navigation
gh-155146: Do not depend on the exact number of allocations in test_class - #155150
Merged
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit intoAug 4, 2026
Merged
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit into
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
…test_class Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
Thanks @serhiy-storchaka for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14, 3.15. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
GH-155155 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.15 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
GH-155156 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
GH-155157 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2026
… test_class (GH-155150) (GH-155157) Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. (cherry picked from commit 416c346) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2026
… test_class (GH-155150) (GH-155156) Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. (cherry picked from commit 416c346) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 4, 2026
deadlovelll
pushed a commit
to deadlovelll/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2026
…ons in test_class (pythonGH-155150) (pythonGH-155156) Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. (cherry picked from commit 416c346) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
hugovk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
… test_class (GH-155150) (#155155) gh-155146: Do not depend on the exact number of allocations in test_class (GH-155150) Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. (cherry picked from commit 416c346) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
mbeijen
pushed a commit
to mbeijen/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2026
…test_class (pythonGH-155150) Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory(). Run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Try to fail every one of the first allocations and accept the first one which fails in the code detaching the instance dictionary from the object, instead of assuming that this is the first allocation after set_nomemory().
Also run the test with the test.support.isolation.runInSubprocess() decorator instead of executing it as a source string in a subprocess.