| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
It patched the bytes object read from the blob, which for a single byte is an immortal singleton, so that the value of that byte was changed in the whole process. Read into a plain buffer instead. The raw read is factored out of read_multiple() into inner_read().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks @serhiy-storchaka for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.15. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
GH-155765 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.15 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…nGH-155703) It patched the bytes object read from the blob, which for a single byte is an immortal singleton, so that the value of that byte was changed in the whole process.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
ass_subscript_slice() patched the bytes object read from the blob and wrote it back.
For a single byte that object is an immortal singleton, so the value of that byte was changed in the whole process.
It now reads into a plain buffer.
The raw read is factored out of read_multiple() into inner_read(), like the existing inner_write().
The negative step case (gh-150449, GH-150450) still raises the same ValueError as before.