This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason
Spam
Abuse
Off Topic
Outdated
Duplicate
Resolved
Low Quality
An alternate implementation might not necessarily call PyState_AddModule but still achieve the same end result. Perhaps just say that Python attaches the module to the interpreter state and should be accessible through PyState_FindModule. How they achieve that should be up to the implementation
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason
Spam
Abuse
Off Topic
Outdated
Duplicate
Resolved
Low Quality
All ways I can find of wording this more precisely make it significantly harder to understand.
I think it's understood that alternate implementations are free to do an equivalent of calling PyState_AddModule, instead of actually calling it. They should still implement the PyState_AddModule semantics (unless they decide to differ, of course).
Another thing that's implied here is that Python only calls this on single-phase-init modules. And another is that it's idempotent.
Should we document all that? How much hand-holding do authors of alternative import mechanisms need? (This is a real question, which you are in a good position to answer.)
so it is unnecessary (but harmless) to call it from module initialization
code. An explicit call is needed only if the module's own init code
subsequently calls ``PyState_FindModule``.
The function is mainly intended for implementing alternative import
mechanisms (either by calling it directly, or by referring to its
implementation for details of the required state updates).
Return 0 on success or -1 on failure.
.. versionadded:: 3.3
.. c:function:: int PyState_RemoveModule(PyModuleDef *def)
Removes the module object created from *def* from the interpreter state.
Return 0 on success or -1 on failure.
.. versionadded:: 3.3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityAn alternate implementation might not necessarily call PyState_AddModule but still achieve the same end result. Perhaps just say that Python attaches the module to the interpreter state and should be accessible through PyState_FindModule. How they achieve that should be up to the implementation
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityAll ways I can find of wording this more precisely make it significantly harder to understand.
I think it's understood that alternate implementations are free to do an equivalent of calling PyState_AddModule, instead of actually calling it. They should still implement the PyState_AddModule semantics (unless they decide to differ, of course).
Another thing that's implied here is that Python only calls this on single-phase-init modules. And another is that it's idempotent.
Should we document all that? How much hand-holding do authors of alternative import mechanisms need? (This is a real question, which you are in a good position to answer.)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityBut my main issue is:
If you can think of a better way, let me know! Otherwise I can merge this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.