FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

gh-81881: Raise a shutil.SpecialFileError when copying a Unix socket by AWhetter · Pull Request #16575 · python/cpython · GitHub

/ cpython Public

gh-81881: Raise a shutil.SpecialFileError when copying a Unix socket - #16575

Closed
AWhetter wants to merge 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
AWhetter:fix-issue-37700
Closed

gh-81881: Raise a shutil.SpecialFileError when copying a Unix socket#16575
AWhetter wants to merge 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
AWhetter:fix-issue-37700

Conversation

AWhetter commented Oct 4, 2019
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This used to raise an OSError with a platform dependent message.
This change always raises a SpecialFileError with a consistent message
no matter the platform.

Tackling special devices wasn't part of the original issue, but it is still technically an issue. Although devices are technically copyable (at least they are with cp), they will likely hang the same as a named pipe would even though a named pipe is technically copyable as well.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37700

This used to raise an OSError with a platform dependent message.
This change always raises a SpecialFileError with a consistent message
no matter the platform.

brandtbucher commented Oct 4, 2019
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the PR @AWhetter!

brandtbucher added the type-feature A feature request or enhancement label Oct 4, 2019

brandtbucher left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

This looks good to me! I would maybe just change the NEWS entry to be less wordy:

:func:`shutil.copyfile` always raises a :exc:`shutil.SpecialFileError` when trying to copy a Unix socket.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

CC @giampaolo @cjerdonek

AWhetter commented Oct 4, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Good idea. I'll get that changed.
When I make changes to a pull request, is it better for me to edit my existing commit, or should I make a new commit for squashing when the branch is merged?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it helps everyone follow the flow of the PR when things aren't force pushed and history isn't rewritten. It will get squashed in the end, anyways!

I just break up my commits so that the individual diffs are easy to follow. So if I'm editing and moving a function, I'll do those in separate commits in order to preserve an easy-to-follow storyline.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Similar to the issue mentioned in bpo-37701, this raises SpecialFileError when src or dest are symlinks to a socket file.

Comment thread Lib/test/test_shutil.py Outdated
else:
self.fail("shutil.Error should have been raised")
finally:
shutil.rmtree(TESTFN2, ignore_errors=True)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

This seems unnecessary as per:

 self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, TESTFN, ignore_errors=True)

...some lines above.

Comment thread Lib/test/test_shutil.py
shutil.rmtree(TESTFN2, ignore_errors=True)

@unittest.skipUnless(hasattr(socket, 'AF_UNIX'), 'requires socket.AF_UNIX')
def test_copytree_socket(self):

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

IMO testing also copytree() is not very useful since internally it uses copyfile (which you are testing).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

I was copying what was done for named pipes for consistency. But having a test for copytree() makes sense to me because if in the future copytree() stopped using copyfile() for some reason, we would still want copytree() to raise an error?

Comment thread Doc/library/shutil.rst Outdated
*dst* and return *dst* in the most efficient way possible.
*src* and *dst* are path-like objects or path names given as strings.

When *src* is a named pipe or a Unix socket, a :exc:`SpecialFileError`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality
-   When *src* is a named pipe or a Unix socket, a :exc:`SpecialFileError`
+   When *src* is a named pipe or a Unix socket, :exc:`SpecialFileError`

Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have made the requested changes; please review again

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@giampaolo: please review the changes made to this pull request.

bedevere-bot requested a review from giampaolo May 18, 2020 23:02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Is there anything else that I can do to help progress this review?

oz123 commented Mar 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@giampaolo can this PR be unblocked?

arhadthedev changed the title bpo-37700: Raise a shutil.SpecialFileError when copying a Unix socket gh-81881: Raise a shutil.SpecialFileError when copying a Unix socket Mar 31, 2023
arhadthedev added the stdlib Standard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory label Mar 31, 2023

oz123 commented Mar 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@arhadthedev thanks for the quick response!

arhadthedev commented Mar 31, 2023
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

shutil.SpecialFileError seems to be undocumented. Would anybody add it into the documentation via a separate PR?

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting change review stdlib Standard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL