FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

[3.9] bpo-42560: rewrite of Tkinter docs "life preserver" (GH-27842) by miss-islington · Pull Request #27911 · python/cpython · GitHub

Repository navigation

[3.9] bpo-42560: rewrite of Tkinter docs "life preserver" (GH-27842) - #27911

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-08830a4-3.9
Closed

miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-08830a4-3.9

Conversation

miss-islington commented Aug 23, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa lukasz@langa.pl
(cherry picked from commit 08830a4)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman mark@markroseman.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue42560

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roseman and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
(cherry picked from commit 08830a4)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roseman and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roseman and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roseman and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roseman and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

ambv closed this Aug 23, 2021
miss-islington deleted the backport-08830a4-3.9 branch August 23, 2021 19:05

terryjreedy commented Aug 28, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Given that there was no merge conflict, why was this closed? If it it not going to be merged, the label on #27842 should be removed. I am asking in particular because bpo-45029 is about the old example, run in 3.9, that this replaces. So backporting the replacement seems like a good idea.

E-Paine commented Sep 17, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ambv Can we reopen this for merge? As Terry said, bpo-45029 is related to this, so IMO it would be nice to get this in the 3.9 docs.

hpmason mannequin mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting review docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL