Repository navigation
bpo-45516: add protocol description to the TraversableResources docum… - #29173
Merged
jaraco merged 1 commit intoOct 23, 2021
Merged
jaraco merged 1 commit into
jaraco merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
…entation Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@riseup.net>
FFY00
force-pushed
the
bpo-45516-traversableresources-files
branch
from
4f0547a to
6754ef1
Compare
October 22, 2021 20:58
jaraco
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2021
jaraco
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
@jaraco: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…entation
Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns lains@riseup.net
https://bugs.python.org/issue45516