| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Add time.thread_time() and time.thread_time_ns() |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| Expand Up | @@ -1258,6 +1258,112 @@ Process time for profiling as nanoseconds:\n\ | |
| sum of the kernel and user-space CPU time."); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| #if defined(MS_WINDOWS) | ||
| #define HAVE_THREAD_TIME | ||
| static int | ||
| _PyTime_GetThreadTimeWithInfo(_PyTime_t *tp, _Py_clock_info_t *info) | ||
| { | ||
| HANDLE thread; | ||
| FILETIME creation_time, exit_time, kernel_time, user_time; | ||
| ULARGE_INTEGER large; | ||
| _PyTime_t ktime, utime, t; | ||
| BOOL ok; | ||
|
|
||
| thread = GetCurrentThread(); | ||
| ok = GetThreadTimes(thread, &creation_time, &exit_time, | ||
| &kernel_time, &user_time); | ||
| if (!ok) { | ||
| PyErr_SetFromWindowsErr(0); | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (info) { | ||
| info->implementation = "GetThreadTimes()"; | ||
| info->resolution = 1e-7; | ||
| info->monotonic = 1; | ||
| info->adjustable = 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| large.u.LowPart = kernel_time.dwLowDateTime; | ||
| large.u.HighPart = kernel_time.dwHighDateTime; | ||
| ktime = large.QuadPart; | ||
|
|
||
| large.u.LowPart = user_time.dwLowDateTime; | ||
| large.u.HighPart = user_time.dwHighDateTime; | ||
| utime = large.QuadPart; | ||
|
|
||
| /* ktime and utime have a resolution of 100 nanoseconds */ | ||
| t = _PyTime_FromNanoseconds((ktime + utime) * 100); | ||
| *tp = t; | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #elif defined(HAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME) && defined(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID) | ||
| #define HAVE_THREAD_TIME | ||
| static int | ||
| _PyTime_GetThreadTimeWithInfo(_PyTime_t *tp, _Py_clock_info_t *info) | ||
| { | ||
| struct timespec ts; | ||
| const clockid_t clk_id = CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID; | ||
| const char *function = "clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID)"; | ||
|
|
||
| if (clock_gettime(clk_id, &ts)) { | ||
| PyErr_SetFromErrno(PyExc_OSError); | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
| if (info) { | ||
| struct timespec res; | ||
| info->implementation = function; | ||
| info->monotonic = 1; | ||
| info->adjustable = 0; | ||
| if (clock_getres(clk_id, &res)) { | ||
|
Comment thread
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality(clock_gettime(clk_id, &ts) != 0) but (clock_getres(clk_id, &res)).
Sorry, something went wrong.
All reactions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThis is really a copy-paste job.
Sorry, something went wrong.
All reactions
|
||
| PyErr_SetFromErrno(PyExc_OSError); | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
| info->resolution = res.tv_sec + res.tv_nsec * 1e-9; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (_PyTime_FromTimespec(tp, &ts) < 0) { | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
| #endif | ||
|
|
||
| #ifdef HAVE_THREAD_TIME | ||
| static PyObject * | ||
| time_thread_time(PyObject *self, PyObject *unused) | ||
| { | ||
| _PyTime_t t; | ||
| if (_PyTime_GetThreadTimeWithInfo(&t, NULL) < 0) { | ||
| return NULL; | ||
| } | ||
| return _PyFloat_FromPyTime(t); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| PyDoc_STRVAR(thread_time_doc, | ||
| "thread_time() -> float\n\ | ||
| \n\ | ||
| Thread time for profiling: sum of the kernel and user-space CPU time."); | ||
|
|
||
| static PyObject * | ||
| time_thread_time_ns(PyObject *self, PyObject *unused) | ||
| { | ||
| _PyTime_t t; | ||
| if (_PyTime_GetThreadTimeWithInfo(&t, NULL) < 0) { | ||
| return NULL; | ||
| } | ||
| return _PyTime_AsNanosecondsObject(t); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| PyDoc_STRVAR(thread_time_ns_doc, | ||
| "thread_time() -> int\n\ | ||
| \n\ | ||
| Thread time for profiling as nanoseconds:\n\ | ||
| sum of the kernel and user-space CPU time."); | ||
| #endif | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| static PyObject * | ||
| time_get_clock_info(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | ||
| { | ||
| Expand Down Expand Up | @@ -1311,6 +1417,13 @@ time_get_clock_info(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |
| return NULL; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| #ifdef HAVE_THREAD_TIME | ||
| else if (strcmp(name, "thread_time") == 0) { | ||
| if (_PyTime_GetThreadTimeWithInfo(&t, &info) < 0) { | ||
| return NULL; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| #endif | ||
| else { | ||
| PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "unknown clock"); | ||
| return NULL; | ||
| Expand Down Expand Up | @@ -1519,6 +1632,10 @@ static PyMethodDef time_methods[] = { | |
| {"monotonic_ns", time_monotonic_ns, METH_NOARGS, monotonic_ns_doc}, | ||
| {"process_time", time_process_time, METH_NOARGS, process_time_doc}, | ||
| {"process_time_ns", time_process_time_ns, METH_NOARGS, process_time_ns_doc}, | ||
| #ifdef HAVE_THREAD_TIME | ||
| {"thread_time", time_thread_time, METH_NOARGS, thread_time_doc}, | ||
| {"thread_time_ns", time_thread_time_ns, METH_NOARGS, thread_time_ns_doc}, | ||
| #endif | ||
| {"perf_counter", time_perf_counter, METH_NOARGS, perf_counter_doc}, | ||
| {"perf_counter_ns", time_perf_counter_ns, METH_NOARGS, perf_counter_ns_doc}, | ||
| {"get_clock_info", time_get_clock_info, METH_VARARGS, get_clock_info_doc}, | ||
| Expand Down | ||
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityShouldn't it be 0.100 - 0.020 or maybe just 0.100?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityPlease don't be too strict, or the test will fail randomly on grumpy buildbots.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThe whole CPU time in those 0.1 seconds was not necessarily allocated to the current process / thread.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.