[backport to 3.5] bpo-27122: Fix comment to point to correct issue number (#47) - #50
Merged
berkerpeksag merged 1 commit intoFeb 12, 2017
Merged
[backport to 3.5] bpo-27122: Fix comment to point to correct issue number (#47)#50berkerpeksag merged 1 commit into
berkerpeksag merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
It took me quite a bit to figure out what this was referring to, since the given issue number is wrong, and the original commit message I found through git blame lists a different, also wrong issue number... see https://bugs.python.org/issue27122#msg279449 (cherry picked from commit af88e7e)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 3.5 #50 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage ? 82.37%
======================================
Files ? 1427
Lines ? 350948
Branches ? 0
======================================
Hits ? 289099
Misses ? 61849
Partials ? 0
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Mariatta
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2017
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
|
Thanks for the approvals, Mariatta. GitHub overwrote the original author's name again: c6d2f49 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Mr3x33
added a commit
to Mr3x33/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2021
colesbury
referenced
this pull request
in colesbury/nogil
Oct 6, 2021
Once the threads object queue is empty, other threads may explicitly merge reference counts immediately. It's no longer safe for the original thread to do RC operations because of races with accesses to ob_ref_local. This ensures that the queue is empty when it's removed from the hashtable mapping thread-id to queue. There are still other RC operations that can happen during thread destruction, so the call to _Py_queue_destroy will probably need to be moved. See #50
colesbury
referenced
this pull request
in colesbury/nogil
Oct 6, 2021
A partially initialized thread may have an entry in the interpreter without a corresponding entry in the biased-refcounting hashtable. See #50
jaraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2022
Now reads: `The PR then needs to be backported manually.`
jaraco
added a commit
to jaraco/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2023
* Added a config for dependabot. * Update features list for dependabot. Co-authored-by: KOLANICH <kolan_n@mail.ru>
mgmacias95
pushed a commit
to mgmacias95/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2023
This was referenced Feb 11, 2025
DinoV
added a commit
to DinoV/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
Flow in _PyInterpreterFrame and fix issue when global not defined
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It took me quite a bit to figure out what this was referring to,
since the given issue number is wrong, and the original commit
message I found through git blame lists a different, also wrong
issue number... see https://bugs.python.org/issue27122#msg279449
(cherry picked from commit af88e7e)