Repository navigation
[3.6] bpo-32028: Fix suggestions for indented print statements (GH-4688) - #5249
Merged
ncoghlan merged 1 commit intoJan 20, 2018
Merged
ncoghlan merged 1 commit into
ncoghlan merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
The suggested replacement for print statements previously failed to account for leading whitespace and hence could end up including unwanted text in the proposed call to the print builtin. Patch by Sanyam Khurana. (cherry picked from commit d57f26c)
ncoghlan
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2018
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Author
|
@CuriousLearner and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The suggested replacement for print statements previously failed to account
for leading whitespace and hence could end up including unwanted text in
the proposed call to the print builtin.
Patch by Sanyam Khurana.
(cherry picked from commit d57f26c)
https://bugs.python.org/issue32028