FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

bpo-33723: Remove time.thread_time() functional tests by vstinner · Pull Request #8265 · python/cpython · GitHub

/ cpython Public

bpo-33723: Remove time.thread_time() functional tests - #8265

Closed
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:masterfrom
vstinner:test_thread_time
Closed

bpo-33723: Remove time.thread_time() functional tests#8265
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:masterfrom
vstinner:test_thread_time

Conversation

vstinner commented Jul 12, 2018
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

These functional tests were too fragile: we already tolerate to only
get a delta of 20 ms whereas the test runs a busy loop during 100 ms.
The test failed on a buildbot because the delta was only 19 ms.
Reducing the minimum delta would make the test meaningless, so remove
it instead.

https://bugs.python.org/issue33723

These functional tests were too fragile: we already tolerate to only
get a delta of 20 ms whereas the test runs a busy loop during 100 ms.
The test failed on a buildbot because the delta was only 19 ms.
Reducing the minimum delta would make the test meaningless, so remove
it instead.

pitrou commented Jul 12, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pity :-( Perhaps we should have a requirement that buildbots do not get deployed on overloaded machines? This kind of test is useful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@pitrou: if you prefer to keep the test, I propose PR #8267 to reduce the minimum time from 20 ms to 15 ms.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I merged the PR 8267.

vstinner closed this Jul 12, 2018
vstinner deleted the test_thread_time branch July 12, 2018 13:33
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL