Repository navigation
Stubtest: ignore a new protocol dunder - #16895
Merged
JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit intoFeb 9, 2024
Merged
JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit into
JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`)
cdce8p
pushed a commit
to cdce8p/mypy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`) Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and python/typeshed#11383 (cherry picked from commit 517f5ae)
cdce8p
pushed a commit
to cdce8p/mypy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`) Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and python/typeshed#11383 (cherry picked from commit 517f5ae)
JelleZijlstra
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`) Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and python/typeshed#11383 (cherry picked from commit 517f5ae) Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member literally called __non_callable_proto_members__)
Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and python/typeshed#11383