| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityIsn't there an expr cache that stores errors too? Is it possible to use that instead?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityWe already explicitly bypass the expr cache for lambdas, so probably no?
mypy/mypy/checkexpr.py
Lines 6035 to 6050 in 843d133
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThat makes some sense, but I don't quite get the comment there. I also don't get why this extra cache exists...
I guess the comment is saying "the same expr can be evaluated multiple times in different contexts" which makes a bit of sense?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI also do not fully understand why a separate resolved_type storage is needed at all. It might well be just a remainder that wasn't cleaned up when expr_cache was introduced, but I'm not certain.
This lambda special-casing is coming from in #19408 and #19505, we discovered it independently. lambda exprs are handled in a completely different way with and without type context (see infer_lambda_type_using_context and branching on its result). There's a big difference between accepting a ReturnStmt and its expression alone - supporting both ways essentially means that we use different context stack entries on different paths for the same expression. This part is a bit difficult to reason about, but I still hope I got it correctly...
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityOK, I guess it would make sense to try removing resolved_type cache in a followup...
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.