| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: steam.py (https://github.com/Gobot1234/steam.py)
+ steam/ext/csgo/state.py:213: error: Argument 1 to "__delitem__" of "dict" has incompatible type "int"; expected "AssetID" [arg-type]
+ steam/ext/csgo/state.py:214: error: Argument 1 to "__delitem__" of "dict" has incompatible type "int"; expected "AssetID" [arg-type]
rotki (https://github.com/rotki/rotki)
- rotkehlchen/chain/evm/decoding/zerox/decoder.py:146: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
- rotkehlchen/chain/ethereum/modules/sky/decoder.py:147: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you planning to address the regressions in this PR, or should we merge this as is, since this fixes a more important regression?
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
|
||
| def f2(whatever: object, uid: UserId | Other): | ||
| if whatever == uid: | ||
| reveal_type(whatever) # N: Revealed type is "builtins.int | __main__.Other" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a bit questionable, since whatever could be float or another numeric type that happens to compare equal to int (not directly related to the changes in this PR).
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
The regressions are from what the PR does (no longer narrowing to a NewType), so nothing to address beyond deciding what behaviour we want mypy to have. (I don't have a strong opinion / am not a big NewType user myself. Allowing narrowing is good on primer and the implementation is simpler and consistent with subclassing, but I can see the argument made in #20733 about having to be explicit) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like that NewTypes require an explicit constructor call.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Fixes #20733
I might make this type munging look a little nicer in a future refactor
This introduces new errors in two primer projects