| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for doing something about this.
Question for @kumaraditya303 -- Have you actually tried this before and after the regression you mentioned as example?
Question for @ericsnowcurrently -- Do you agree this is useful?
Sorry, something went wrong.
@gvanrossum: The regression I linked above 1 is not caused by a single change but rather accumulation of multiple slowdown caused by multiple changes of which the most significant ones being python/cpython#91666 and python/cpython#27077. Since there is no benchmark in pyperformance to exercise coverage performance, the slowdown was unnoticed. Once this benchmark is added, it will help us pinpoint which commits caused the most slowdown with a simple git bisect between 3.10 and main branches. Footnotes |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Nevertheless it would be interesting to see the numbers of running this BM on the state before and after said commits to demonstrate its usefulness. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I am running the benchmarks now, will post soon. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@gvanrossum Benchmarking before and after python/cpython@944fffe commit Results:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yeah, it's a helpful indicator of impact. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Add a coverage benchmark to help benchmarking and avoid regressions such as python/cpython#93516.
Benchmark result 3.10 vs 3.12 main branch.