FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

fix(base): allow persisting local attributes when updating object by nejch · Pull Request #1443 · python-gitlab/python-gitlab · GitHub

Repository navigation

fix(base): allow persisting local attributes when updating object - #1443

Closed
nejch wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/persist-attributes-on-save
Closed

nejch wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/persist-attributes-on-save

Conversation

nejch commented May 2, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #1395.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1443 (796c700) into master (b563cdc) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 81.81%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1443   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.24%   80.24%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines        4064     4081   +17     
=======================================
+ Hits         3261     3275   +14     
- Misses        803      806    +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 80.24% <81.81%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gitlab/mixins.py 77.13% <66.66%> (-0.25%) ⬇️
gitlab/base.py 88.88% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
gitlab/types.py 90.00% <0.00%> (-2.60%) ⬇️
gitlab/exceptions.py 96.52% <0.00%> (-1.30%) ⬇️
gitlab/__main__.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
gitlab/cli.py 56.36% <0.00%> (+2.30%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b563cdc...796c700. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm not sure, if this makes sense. python-gitlab should be a light wrapper around the GitLab API. If we start adding more custom things (other than the required ones e.g. lazy) that might become less maintainable and maybe also confusing for the users? WDYT?

nejch commented May 6, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing this in favor of #1448 as discussed.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL