FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Fixed errors breaking .NET Remoting on method invoke (#276) by den-run-ai · Pull Request #632 · pythonnet/pythonnet · GitHub

Repository navigation

Fixed errors breaking .NET Remoting on method invoke (#276) - #632

Closed
den-run-ai wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
pr/631
Closed

den-run-ai wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
pr/631

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

#276

Checklist

Check all those that are applicable and complete.

  • Make sure to include one or more tests for your change
  • If an enhancement PR, please create docs and at best an example
  • Add yourself to AUTHORS
  • Updated the CHANGELOG

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@callumnoble @jcarole this PR for .NET Remoting cannot be merged, because more general solution that would work on .NET Core is necessary. .NET Remoting is deprecated and its API is not available in .NET Core and .NET Standard.

jcarole commented Feb 26, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@denfromufa Just to confirm, does this mean that Pythonnet 2.0.0 will be the last version that supports .NET Remoting?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For my application which needs this I'm deploying a wheel I built with 2.3 + this patch. Is working well.

I see the fails from the CI build. Would you support an #if / #endif conditional for building .NET with version that supports remoting. By definition this check does not need to run on .NET Core since the remoting the library uses wont have been able to run on it!

The same define as used here could work?

#if NETSTANDARD

den-run-ai commented Feb 26, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@callumnoble that looks reasonable, would you like to make this commit? you can open a new PR if needed.

jcarole commented Feb 26, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@denfromufa @callumnoble Exactly. Since .NET Remoting isn't supported by .NET Core (yet, and probably ever), a conditional compilation solution seems ideal.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Will look into doing this sometime in the next few days.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@denfromufa opened new pr for this #637

den-run-ai closed this Mar 2, 2018
filmor deleted the pr/631 branch May 28, 2018 09:47
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL