| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package : could not load export data: no export data for "scroll-tech/rollup/mock_bridge"" WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the NewLayer2Relayer function within the l2_relayer.go file. The error handling logic has been simplified to validate only the commit and finalize sender addresses for uniqueness, omitting the gas oracle sender address. This adjustment alters the control flow and error messaging while retaining the initialization of the relevant sender addresses. Additionally, the version number in version.go has been incremented from v4.4.79 to v4.4.80, reflecting an update in the versioning information. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review details Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d7822a and 42e9987. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? ❤️ Share 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
Documentation and Community
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)rollup/internal/controller/relayer/l2_relayer.go (1)📜 Review details90-100: LGTM! Consider enhancing the error message.
The address validation logic is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective of splitting signer checks. However, the error message could be more specific about why the addresses must be different.
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("commit, and finalize sender addresses must be different. Got: Commit=%s, Finalize=%s", commitSenderAddr.Hex(), finalizeSenderAddr.Hex()) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("commit and finalize sender addresses must be different to ensure security separation of concerns. Got: Commit=%s, Finalize=%s", commitSenderAddr.Hex(), finalizeSenderAddr.Hex())
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa2401c and 5dcdbae.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)90-100: Verify contract requirements for address separation.
Let's verify that the L1 rollup contract enforces these address separation requirements.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 18.18182% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1568 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 52.06% 52.06%
========================================
Files 157 157
Lines 12479 12472 -7
========================================
- Hits 6497 6494 -3
+ Misses 5421 5418 -3
+ Partials 561 560 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Purpose or design rationale of this PR
Decouples the config dependencies so that gas-oracle and rollup-relayer only need to initialize the needed accounts.
PR title
Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:
Deployment tag versioning
Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?
Breaking change label
Does this PR have the breaking-change label?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores