FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

sse4.2: first attempt at implementing mm_cmpestra by masterchef2209 · Pull Request #280 · simd-everywhere/simde · GitHub

sse4.2: first attempt at implementing mm_cmpestra - #280

Closed
masterchef2209 wants to merge 14 commits into
simd-everywhere:masterfrom
masterchef2209:hidayat/may10_1
Closed

sse4.2: first attempt at implementing mm_cmpestra#280
masterchef2209 wants to merge 14 commits into
simd-everywhere:masterfrom
masterchef2209:hidayat/may10_1

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

sse4.2: first attempt at implementing mm_cmpestra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

please tell me if I am going in right direction in implementation of the function and generating test cases.
Thank You

masterchef2209 requested a review from nemequ May 9, 2020 22:04

nemequ left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

This is a good start. A lot of the issues I see right away are relatively minor, but hopefully they'll make the code a little easier to understand, which should make it easier to optimize in the future.

Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread test/x86/sse4.2.c
Comment thread test/x86/sse4.2.c Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thank You for the review, it will take some time to go through all of this :)

mr-c left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated

mr-c left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated

mr-c commented May 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That is odd, Travis CI hasn't seen the latest commit ..

nemequ left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Excellent progress! I added some more comments, but don't get discouraged. These functions are definitely a bit of a pani to implement (which is a big part of why they're not implemented yet), and you're doing really well. I just want to be a bit pedantic about this first function since it's probably going to be a model for the others.

I've tried to explain the reasons for each change, but if there is anything you're not clear on please ask.

Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated
Comment thread simde/x86/sse4.2.h Outdated

nemequ commented May 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The implementation looks good to me. As soon as you have the tests done we can merge it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The implementation looks good to me. As soon as you have the tests done we can merge it.

I am working on it, hopefully I will be able to finish it by today.
Thanks

nemequ commented May 17, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #295

nemequ closed this May 17, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL