#179 Use latest org.json dependency instead of android-json - #193
Closed
david-m-s wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
#179 Use latest org.json dependency instead of android-json#193david-m-s wants to merge 1 commit into
david-m-s wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Sorry, something went wrong.
… disabled since they contain illegal json (duplicated entries) which is not supported in the new parser, as it should be.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
Thanks for your submission. This should be address in #194. A few more things were needed to make the change, including handling the change of JSONException to a RuntimeException. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use latest org.json dependency instead of android-json. Two tests are disabled since they contain illegal json (duplicated entries) which is not supported in the new parser, as it should be.
Address issue #179