Thanks for the contribution! Before we can merge this, we need @ArielTM to sign the Salesforce Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 11.11111% with 24 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.20%. Comparing base (1303413) to head (dd5f4e6).
⚠️ Report is 175 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (11.11%) is below the target coverage (50.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1667      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.36%   85.20%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         113      113              
  Lines       12802    12829      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits        10928    10931       +3     
- Misses       1874     1898      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Hi @ArielTM thanks for you contribution 🚀 they are alway welcome

Unfortunately we need to hold off on introducing these changes due to these APIs being in a limited access stage

This API is currently in a limited access stage. You may be able to obtain a token and call the API, but to get a valid response, you must be enrolled in the program. Contact Customer Experience at feedback@slack.com to request to be added.

We would also need unit tests for these changes 🙏

@WilliamBergamin Until this is in "limited access" , would you say the best way to use this api would be to do something like this instead ?

app.client.api_call(
                api_method="assistant.search.context",
                http_verb="POST",
                headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ.get('SLACK_BOT_TOKEN')}",},
                json={
                    "action_token": action_token,
                    "query": text,
                    "limit": 5,
                },
            )

@Pythonista7 Yess this is the recommended approach 💯
But you may not need to specify the headers or http_verb if the client is configured correctly