FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Splunk SDK has dependencies not satisfied by Splunk Python · Issue #572 · splunk/splunk-sdk-python · GitHub

Repository navigation

Splunk SDK has dependencies not satisfied by Splunk Python #572

Closed
2 of 2 issues completed
Closed

Description

The Splunk SDK currently has a requirement for deprecation. However, the Python version that is bundled with Splunk Enterprise does not contain deprecation and does not contain packaging, which is a dependency of deprecation.

It is common to use the Splunk SDK for developing Splunk apps (see https://dev.splunk.com/enterprise/docs/developapps/#Splunk-tools). When using version 2.x of the Splunk SDK in apps, those apps will not function correctly because of the missing dependency. It cannot be safely assumed that Splunk enterprise administrators would manually install those dependencies. I would argue that the Splunk SDK should not contain any dependencies that are not satisfied with the Python version that is bundled with Splunk.

Activity

  1. Ickerday commented on Sep 8, 2025

    Collaborator

    Dismissing as stale. Please tell us if the issue persists!

  2. TwilightMercy commented on Sep 8, 2025

    No response to that issue?

  3. hRun commented on Sep 9, 2025

    @Ickerday why does this get marked as stale when no splunk dev ever worked on this? while the duplicate which is similarly unattended remains open?

    the issue still persists and would be trivial to fix. the deprecation library is used a single time in the sdk for documentation purposes which could go into the associated function's docstring just as well and the dependency removed altogether.

  4. Ickerday commented on Sep 9, 2025

    Collaborator

    @hRun I disagree. We have added deprecation as a dependency in #570.
    This docs article describes how to package dependencies with an app. This would also mean any dependencies for splunklib.

    As for the removing the deprecation library, I've added the association with #600, will take a look and get back to you. Cheers!

  5. linked a pull request that will close this issueRemove `ResultsReader`, `six` #670on Sep 9, 2025
  6. gjanders commented on May 8, 2026

    Contributor

    While pull request #670 appears to have merged into development, I cannot see any 2.1.2 or fixed version.

    Will 2.1.2 be released anytime soon? Since I cannot re-open this issue I will open a new one referencing this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions


      Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL