This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2025. It is now read-only.
Stackless issue #201: enable stackless calls of "wrapper_descriptor" - #201
Merged
akruis merged 2 commits intoJan 12, 2019
Merged
akruis merged 2 commits into
akruis merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Sorry, something went wrong.
…ptor" objects, if soft-switching is enabled. The code has been in Stackless forever, but was disabled for some unknown reason.
This was referenced Jan 6, 2019
Closed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author
|
I didn't get any feedback yet and I don't expect to get feedback any time soon. Therefore I'll commit the PR. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Reviewers
Assignees
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
objects, if soft-switching is enabled. The code has been in Stackless
forever, but was disabled for some unknown reason.
@ctismer Christian, do you remember, why this code was disabled?