Ref: #11352
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown_pkg_readmes
status: na
- task: lint_markdown_docs
status: na
- task: lint_markdown
status: na
- task: lint_package_json
status: na
- task: lint_repl_help
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: passed
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: na
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: na
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
Resolves a part of #11352.
Description
This pull request:
ULP bounds (per fixture set, identical for test/test.js and test/test.native.js):
These are the measured minima: each value above is the smallest integer for which the corresponding fixture set passes in full. I computed the exact ULP difference for every fixture point directly (via @stdlib/number/float64/base/ulp-difference) rather than searching by trial and error, so the "next largest" column shows how much headroom each bound has over the runner-up point in its set. The JavaScript and native (C) implementations agree exactly on every fixture point (I built the native add-on locally with make install-node-addons NODE_ADDONS_PATTERN="math/base/special/bessely0" and confirmed identical per-point ULP differences), so the same bounds apply to both test files.
Only the two test files are changed; no source, documentation, or package.json changes are included.
Related Issues
This pull request has the following related issues:
Questions
The large_positive (3716), subnormal (8678), and huge_positive (4053) bounds are large in absolute terms, but they are strictly tighter than the relative tolerances they replace and reflect the accuracy of the current rational-approximation implementation for Y_0 in these regimes. Happy to instead round these to a nearby convenient value if reviewers prefer some headroom over the measured minimum.
Other
Verification performed locally:
Checklist
AI Assistance
If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?
Disclosure
This PR was authored by Claude Code running as an unattended scheduled task. The candidate discovery (scanning the whole repo for the old tolerance idiom, then checking existing ULP-migration PRs to avoid collisions), the test migration, and the ULP bound search (computing the exact per-point ULP difference directly, then confirming determinism via repeated runs) were performed by the agent, following the idiom established in already-migrated packages in math/base/special — most directly math/base/special/bessely1 (#14344), converted just prior to this PR in the same Bessel-function family.
@stdlib-js/reviewers
Generated by Claude Code