Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

Powered by ReviewNB

Codecov Report

Base: 99.60% // Head: 99.60% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (8a623e3) compared to base (ac238b6).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #692   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.60%   99.60%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines       12758    12758           
=======================================
  Hits        12707    12707           
  Misses         51       51           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@seanlaw
side note: the error raised here might be one of those (easy-to-resolve?) cases that might be resolved by the following:

• setting config variable STUMPY_STDDEV_THRESHOLD to smaller value: 1e-20
• refine std calculation if it is less than 1.0 (recall that this can mean not taking advantage of rolling std when we have T = np.random.rand() as std will be definitely less than 1.0

(OR, It might be one of those hard cases where cov becomes very small)

Thanks @NimaSarajpoor. Looks good