| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
rebase your branch, and revbump things that are affected by the changed soname, that's the bare minimum needed to get a review |
Sorry, something went wrong.
@q66 done. BTW, you can configure branch-protection rules in GitHub to require PR branch to be up to date with master; then new contributors will know that at the time they submit a PR, without waiting CI approval from maintainer. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| version=1.0.1 | ||
| revision=3 | ||
| version=1.2.0 | ||
| revision=4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
revision should be 1
Sorry, something went wrong.
| pkgname=geany-plugins | ||
| version=1.37.0 | ||
| revision=1 | ||
| revision=4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should be 2
Sorry, something went wrong.
| libmicrohttpd.so.12 libmicrohttpd-0.9.73_1 | ||
| libmicrodns.so.1 libmicrodns-0.2.0_1 | ||
| libgit2.so.1.0 libgit2-1.0.1_3 | ||
| libgit2.so.1.2 libgit2-1.2.0_4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| libgit2.so.1.2 libgit2-1.2.0_4 | |
| libgit2.so.1.2 libgit2-1.2.0_1 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
from PluginEntry.h:32,
from PluginEntry.c:28:
PrettyPrinter.h:55:22: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
55 | typedef unsigned int bool;
| ^~~~
geany-plugins is broken, needs to be patched probably.
Being slightly out of date is fine, can GH do that? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
you should test-build every revbumped package (with check phase enabled) and make sure it works/does not regress over the previous state (also ensure lint passes) also apply @ericonr's suggestions |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I tried to build geany-plugins on clean workspace, and it's failing with same error: #33568 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
this should be easy to patch, feel free to raise another PR for it (no need to revbump in that one) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed in #33573 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@ericonr @q66 I tried to run same tests for julia in master with ./xbps-src check julia and got the same errors about Unicode tests: Error in testset Unicode:
Error During Test at /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:337
Test threw exception
Expression: collect(graphemes("🤦🏼\u200d♂️")) == ["🤦🏼\u200d♂️"]
ArgumentError: destination has fewer elements than required
Stacktrace:
[1] copyto!(dest::Vector{SubString{String}}, src::Base.Unicode.GraphemeIterator{String})
@ Base ./abstractarray.jl:844
[2] _collect
@ ./array.jl:608 [inlined]
[3] collect(itr::Base.Unicode.GraphemeIterator{String})
@ Base ./array.jl:602
[4] macro expansion
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:337 [inlined]
[5] macro expansion
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Test/src/Test.jl:1151 [inlined]
[6] top-level scope
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:337
Error in testset Unicode:
Error During Test at /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:338
Test threw exception
Expression: collect(graphemes("👨🏻\u200d🤝\u200d👨🏽")) == ["👨🏻\u200d🤝\u200d👨🏽"]
ArgumentError: destination has fewer elements than required
Stacktrace:
[1] copyto!(dest::Vector{SubString{String}}, src::Base.Unicode.GraphemeIterator{String})
@ Base ./abstractarray.jl:844
[2] _collect
@ ./array.jl:608 [inlined]
[3] collect(itr::Base.Unicode.GraphemeIterator{String})
@ Base ./array.jl:602
[4] macro expansion
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:338 [inlined]
[5] macro expansion
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Test/src/Test.jl:1151 [inlined]
[6] top-level scope
@ /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:337
Error in testset Unicode:
Test Failed at /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/Unicode/test/runtests.jl:339
Expression: collect(graphemes("🇸🇪🇸🇪")) == ["🇸🇪", "🇸🇪"]
Evaluated: SubString{String}["🇸🇪🇸", "🇪"] == ["🇸🇪", "🇸🇪"]
Error in testset nghttp2_jll:
Test Failed at /builddir/julia-1.6.1/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/nghttp2_jll/test/runtests.jl:14
Expression: VersionNumber(unsafe_string(info.version_str)) == v"1.41.0"
Evaluated: v"1.45.1" == v"1.41.0"
ERROR: LoadError: Test run finished with errors
in expression starting at /builddir/julia-1.6.1/test/runtests.jl:84
make[1]: *** [Makefile:25: all] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:536: testall] Error 2
=> ERROR: julia-1.6.1_1: do_check: '${make_cmd} ${make_check_args} ${make_check_target}' exited with 2
=> ERROR: in do_check() at common/build-style/gnu-makefile.sh:33
I'm not sure how to fix it. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
don't worry about julia, this is clearly not caused by libgit2, so just put in a make_check=no plus a comment explaining the reason |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@q66 could you please help here? I'm not sure why CI is failing: locally these tests passes fine: ./xbps-src check gnome-builder
./xbps-src install gnome-builder
./xbps-src check libgit2-glib
./xbps-src install libgit2-glibWhat is wrong here? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
you forgot to revbump gnome-builder? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Updated libgit2 to `v1.2.0`, added patch with PR libgit2/libgit2#6032 of `git_remote_name_is_valid` fix.
|
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Updated libgit2 to v1.2.0, added patch with PR
libgit2/libgit2#6032 of
git_remote_name_is_valid fix for libgit2/git2go#834 issue.
General
Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
Ref: #28456
Maintainer: @q66