Add support for el10 - #747
Conversation
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
The ci problems look very relevant but i'm not sure what to do about them. I suspect we need a change to spec_helper_acceptance.rb similar to what the el10 support pr for epel added (installing gnupg2) but limited to osfamily Redhat too but spec_helper_acceptance.rb looks a bit different here and most of all warns it's managed by modulesync. I would appreciate any hints or tips! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Includes version bump of puppet/epel requirement as their support of el10 landed in 6.0.0. Stops syncing spec_helper_acceptance.rb to permit installing gnupg2 before testing on el10.
|
I got some advice from a colleague so i've pushed a new variant that passes ci. If unmanaging spec_helper_acceptance.rb is not acceptable then i'll need a good deal of hints to "find another way". |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
|
||
| configure_beaker(modules: :metadata) | ||
| configure_beaker(modules: :metadata) do |host| | ||
| host.install_package('gnupg2') if fact('os.family') == 'RedHat' && fact('os.release.major').to_i >= 10 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really wish we didn't have to do this here.
@bastelfreak didn't we want to fix that in hostgenerator?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reality is, this line in puppet-epel should not use gpg on el10
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know how to properly fix the epel module (or why it even exists instead of installing the epel-release package), but we could fix this in beaker-hostgenerator if we want:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Pull Request (PR) description
Add support for el10.
This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues