FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Add remaining CI scripts to `pr-checks` by mbg · Pull Request #4064 · github/codeql-action · GitHub

Add remaining CI scripts to pr-checks - #4064

Draft
mbg wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
mbg/ts/remaining-scripts
Draft

Add remaining CI scripts to pr-checks#4064
mbg wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
mbg/ts/remaining-scripts

Conversation

mbg commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.
  • High risk: Changes are not fully under feature flags, have limited visibility and/or cannot be tested outside of production.

Which use cases does this change impact?

Workflow types:

  • Advanced setup - Impacts users who have custom CodeQL workflows.
  • Managed - Impacts users with dynamic workflows (Default Setup, Code Quality, ...).

Products:

  • Code Scanning - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-scanning.
  • Code Quality - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-quality.
  • Other first-party - The changes impact other first-party analyses.
  • Third-party analyses - The changes affect the upload-sarif action.

Environments:

  • Dotcom - Impacts CodeQL workflows on github.com and/or GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency.
  • GHES - Impacts CodeQL workflows on GitHub Enterprise Server.
  • Testing/None - This change does not impact any CodeQL workflows in production.

How did/will you validate this change?

  • Test repository - This change will be tested on a test repository before merging.
  • Unit tests - I am depending on unit test coverage (i.e. tests in .test.ts files).
  • End-to-end tests - I am depending on PR checks (i.e. tests in pr-checks).
  • Other - Please provide details.
  • None - I am not validating these changes.

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

  • Feature flags - All new or changed code paths can be fully disabled with corresponding feature flags.
  • Rollback - Change can only be disabled by rolling back the release or releasing a new version with a fix.
  • Development/testing only - This change cannot cause any failures in production.
  • Other - Please provide details.

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

  • Telemetry - I rely on existing telemetry or have made changes to the telemetry.
    • Dashboards - I will watch relevant dashboards for issues after the release. Consider whether this requires this change to be released at a particular time rather than as part of a regular release.
    • Alerts - New or existing monitors will trip if something goes wrong with this change.
  • Other - Please provide details.

Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?

  • No special considerations - This change can be merged at any time.
  • Special considerations - This change should only be merged once certain preconditions are met. Please provide details of those or link to this PR from an internal issue.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

mbg self-assigned this Jul 31, 2026
github-actions Bot added size/M Should be of average difficulty to review size/XL May be very hard to review and removed size/M Should be of average difficulty to review labels Jul 31, 2026
mbg force-pushed the mbg/ts/remaining-scripts branch from c30ddcc to 86a0c12 Compare July 31, 2026 13:24
mbg force-pushed the mbg/ts/remaining-scripts branch from 86a0c12 to d8e40bf Compare July 31, 2026 13:38
mbg force-pushed the mbg/ts/remaining-scripts branch from d8e40bf to 7e36708 Compare July 31, 2026 16:18
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XL May be very hard to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL