| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Qualitywhy is that a lambda?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Qualitypython-telegram-bot/telegram/ext/_utils/networkloop.py
Line 113 in 315a97f
this line expects a callable. If we simply pass is_runnig=self.running and edit above line to
then we have an infinite loop, b/c setting self.running=False within Updater won't change the value in the network retry loop :) There are probably a billion other ways do to this (pass an object with a running attribute to check, pass a dict with a corresponding entry, pass an event …). This one seemed rather straight forward to me, but I'm open to changing it. Accepting an instance of
would sound like the next best thing to me at first glance
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.