| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 0725049f-22e8-42fc-88b3-337cba3c1536 📥 CommitsReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51c17cd and 3d7f0b9. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. 📝 Walkthrough WalkthroughChangesExample Import Resolution
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3d7f0 The change excludes type-only peer packages from runtime example imports and adds regression coverage; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: tannerlinsley 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. ❤️ ShareComment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Summary
While opening the Basic Use Table example, the preview failed with the following error:
The import resolver treated @types/* peer dependencies as runtime packages and requested metadata from esm.sh. This PR excludes type-only peers from runtime peer resolution and adds regression coverage.
After the change, I confirmed that the example renders correctly.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests