| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
…, so we can support both Argument[this] and interface-method parameters
|
@atorralba — the one integration test that passed was a fluke, I think (I restarted it). With that, the PR is ready for review. Are you able to do that? You've seen most of the implementation already. Thank you for your help, and also thanks to @aschackmull for the valuable input! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As discussed, LGTM :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
In PR #13823, we had rewritten the endpoints that are being considered for framework mode. We used to use `DataFlow::ParameterNode` as endpoints. However, `ParameterNode`s do not exist for the implicit `this` parameter; they also do not exist for bodiless interface-methods. In PR #13823, we forgot to model that `this` only exists for non-static methods and to only consider parameters that we have source code for.
In PR #13823, we had rewritten the endpoints that are being considered for framework mode. We used to use `DataFlow::ParameterNode` as endpoints. However, `ParameterNode`s do not exist for the implicit `this` parameter; they also do not exist for bodiless interface-methods. In PR #13823, we forgot to model that `this` only exists for non-static methods and to only consider parameters that we have source code for.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.