| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This will make it easier to gate the `getRegistryProxy` with a FF, without the significant refactoring that is needed to thread the FFs into `createApiClientWithDetails`
|
As an example of this in action, see https://github.com/github/codeql-action/actions/runs/29347975179/job/87138397597?pr=4007#step:8:312 for the expected log message and the proxy log artifact at https://github.com/github/codeql-action/actions/runs/29347975179/artifacts/8317105753 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Warning
Adds feature-flagged registry-proxy support for retrieving remote CodeQL configuration files from private repositories.
Changes:
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/api-client.ts | Implements proxy-aware API clients. |
| src/api-client.test.ts | Tests proxy configuration. |
| src/config/file.ts | Proxies remote configuration requests. |
| src/config/file.test.ts | Tests feature-flagged proxy selection. |
| src/environment.ts | Defines proxy variables and environment cloning. |
| src/feature-flags.ts | Adds the proxy feature flag. |
| src/testing-utils.ts | Isolates environments between test-builder clones. |
| pr-checks/checks/start-proxy.yml | Exercises proxy-backed initialization. |
| package.json | Adds Undici. |
| package-lock.json | Locks the dependency update. |
| lib/entry-points.js | Generated artifact; excluded from review. |
| .github/workflows/__start-proxy.yml | Generated workflow; excluded from review. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| // Should use it when the FF is enabled and the environment variables are set. | ||
| await target | ||
| .withFeatures([Feature.ProxyApiRequests, Feature.NewRemoteFileAddresses]) | ||
| .withEnv((env) => { | ||
| env.set(RegistryProxyVars.PROXY_HOST, "localhost"); | ||
| env.set(RegistryProxyVars.PROXY_PORT, "1234"); | ||
| }) | ||
| .logs(t, "Using private registry proxy at 'http://localhost:1234'") | ||
| .passes(t.truthy); | ||
|
|
||
| // But not when the FF is not enabled. | ||
| await target | ||
| .withFeatures([Feature.NewRemoteFileAddresses]) | ||
| .withEnv((env) => { | ||
| env.set(RegistryProxyVars.PROXY_HOST, "localhost"); | ||
| env.set(RegistryProxyVars.PROXY_PORT, "1234"); | ||
| }) | ||
| .notLogs(t, "Using private registry proxy at 'http://localhost:1234'") | ||
| .throws(t, { message: errorMessage }); | ||
|
|
||
| // And not when the environment variables aren't set. | ||
| await target | ||
| .withFeatures([Feature.ProxyApiRequests, Feature.NewRemoteFileAddresses]) | ||
| .notLogs(t, "Using private registry proxy at 'http://localhost:1234'") | ||
| .throws(t, { message: errorMessage }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that these should be three individual unit tests—per best-practice. But, that's quite a lot of boilerplate setup code to duplicate. You could put it into a helper setup method, but not crazy about that either. I'll leave that up to you whether to keep as-is, or split/refactor.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no strong feelings here. I can break this up into three separate tests, but these can also be viewed as three separate assertions. Not duplicating the boilerplate isn't hard.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This makes that function testable.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
This PR allows the CodeQL Action to use the private registry authentication proxy when fetching remote configuration files. The authentication proxy is available in Default Setup workflows. Doing so allows configuration files to be retrieved from private repositories, provided that a suitable git_source registry is set up for the organisation.
#4000 has laid the groundwork for this, by always enabling git_source registries when they are available.
The change is behind a new FF.
Risk assessment
For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:
Which use cases does this change impact?
Workflow types:
Products:
Environments:
How did/will you validate this change?
If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?
How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?
Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?
Merge / deployment checklist