Making cors a property instead of having two separate methods. - #768
Merged
dhermes merged 1 commit intoMar 30, 2015
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
This was referenced Mar 28, 2015
Comment thread
gcloud/storage/bucket.py
Outdated
This comment was marked as spam.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
LGTM w/ exception of my :rtype: comment. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
dhermes
force-pushed
the
make-cors-property
branch
from
5d83599 to
970e1c0
Compare
March 30, 2015 18:56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Author
|
Wrapped the change into the original commit and rebased after #774 just for fun |
Sorry, something went wrong.
dhermes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2015
Making cors a property instead of having two separate methods.
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
* fix: handle None when converting numerics to parquet * lint and fix unit test * add check for pandas.NA
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
* feat: publish RateLimitInfo and FeatureFlag protos PiperOrigin-RevId: 527878708 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@f129f48 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@e02c87d Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiZTAyYzg3ZDlkMGM5YTc3ZjJiMTcyNjhhODZmNDYyYjVhMWQ2NmJiZCJ9 * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md * fix: Add feature flag proto to BUILD file PiperOrigin-RevId: 528468347 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@38247e8 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@17e62a1 Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiMTdlNjJhMWFiNWYyMmQ3ZDUzNzY3NWE2NTkxNTcyMDdlNDA2ZTYzZCJ9 * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md --------- Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Basically just replace `json` argument with `data` Apparently, the `json` parameter in requests.Session.request() method does not expect JSON string, but expects python dictionary instead, which is not intuitive and does not even match the documentation of the method: https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/master/requests/sessions.py#L483. At the same time in the Quickstart, it is explicitly said that `json` parameter was added in version `2.4.2` and expects python `dict`, while `data` argument can process raw encoded json string.
parthea
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
* use latest mypy for check * use separate variable for error_info list vs dict * make wrapped call generic * fix typing for nullable retry functions * include async_rest in mypy installation * removed generic application --------- Co-authored-by: Anthonios Partheniou <partheniou@google.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@eaef28e Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:f8ca7655fa8a449cadcabcbce4054f593dcbae7aeeab34aa3fcc8b5cf7a93c9e Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@eaef28e Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:f8ca7655fa8a449cadcabcbce4054f593dcbae7aeeab34aa3fcc8b5cf7a93c9e Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2026
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@69fabae Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:562802bfac02e012a6ac34eda282f81d06e77326b82a32d7bbb1369ff552b387 Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
api-core, cloud-core, and resumable-media wil all be releasing Python3-only 2.x versions shortly. Closes #767.
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
* chore(python): drop python 3.6 Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@4f89b13 Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:e7bb19d47c13839fe8c147e50e02e8b6cf5da8edd1af8b82208cd6f66cc2829c * add api_description to .repo-metadata.json * require python 3.7+ in setup.py * remove python 3.6 sample configs * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md * exclude templated README * restore manual changes to noxfile.py * update owlbot.py to apply manual changes from #759 * regenerate pb2 files using latest version of grpcio tools Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anthonios Partheniou <partheniou@google.com> Co-authored-by: Astha Mohta <35952883+asthamohta@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@tseaver based on your comment, this drops one of the non-property data access pairs. More importantly, it drops one of the internal users of patch().