In investigating #25894 I discovered that despite being documented as:
To disable labeling of minor ticks when 'labelOnlyBase' is False, use minor_thresholds=(0, 0). This is the default for the "classic" style.
It actually only removes some minor tick labels (e.g. with base of 10: 11-14 will get labels, but 16-19 (15 is edge case, dependent on floating point rounding, 1.4, or 140 also similar))
Only really affects plots that are zoomed in to much less than one decade, which arguably doesn't make sense to use a log scale, but still seems incongruous with the documented "this turns off minor ticks".
diff --git i/lib/matplotlib/ticker.py w/lib/matplotlib/ticker.py
index 4c33e8c9af..5cb1ca6746 100644
--- i/lib/matplotlib/ticker.py+++ w/lib/matplotlib/ticker.py@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ class LogFormatter(Formatter):
# It's probably a colorbar with
# a format kwarg setting a LogFormatter in the manner
# that worked with 1.5.x, but that doesn't work now.
- self._sublabels = {1} # label powers of base+ self._sublabels = np.array([1]) # label powers of base
return
b = self._base
@@ -995,17 +995,16 @@ class LogFormatter(Formatter):
if numticks > self.minor_thresholds[0]:
# Label only bases
- self._sublabels = {1}+ self._sublabels = np.array([1])
elif numdec > self.minor_thresholds[1]:
# Add labels between bases at log-spaced coefficients;
# include base powers in case the locations include
# "major" and "minor" points, as in colorbar.
- c = np.geomspace(1, b, int(b)//2 + 1)- self._sublabels = set(np.round(c))+ self._sublabels = np.geomspace(1, b, int(b)//2 + 1).round()
# For base 10, this yields (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10).
else:
# Label all integer multiples of base**n.
- self._sublabels = set(np.arange(1, b + 1))+ self._sublabels = np.arange(1, b + 1)
def _num_to_string(self, x, vmin, vmax):
return self._pprint_val(x, vmax - vmin) if 1 <= x <= 10000 else f"{x:1.0e}"
@@ -1021,11 +1020,10 @@ class LogFormatter(Formatter):
fx = math.log(x) / math.log(b)
is_x_decade = _is_close_to_int(fx)
exponent = round(fx) if is_x_decade else np.floor(fx)
- coeff = round(b ** (fx - exponent))
if self.labelOnlyBase and not is_x_decade:
return ''
- if self._sublabels is not None and coeff not in self._sublabels:+ if self._sublabels is not None and not np.isin(x, self._sublabels * b**exponent):
return ''
vmin, vmax = self.axis.get_view_interval()
i.e. to detect whether if a minor tick is at a (sublabel * b**expoenent value) (e.g. 2*10^1 = 20), just compute all these values, rather than trying to round() the mantissa (this is wrong if we have subticks coming from an AutoLocator in the case of #12865.
Actually the fix above is likely wrong because it would break #12865 (we actually do want these intermediate ticks to be labeled). I'm not entirely sure what the clean fix would be, but the patch at #29698 (comment) still seems reasonable to me (even though it seems to be mostly working around the underlying issue).
Activity
anntzer commented on Mar 6, 2025
I think the fix here is
i.e. to detect whether if a minor tick is at a (sublabel * b**expoenent value) (e.g. 2*10^1 = 20), just compute all these values, rather than trying to round() the mantissa (this is wrong if we have subticks coming from an AutoLocator in the case of #12865.
Tests & PR left as an exercise.
anntzer commented on Mar 11, 2025
Actually the fix above is likely wrong because it would break #12865 (we actually do want these intermediate ticks to be labeled). I'm not entirely sure what the clean fix would be, but the patch at #29698 (comment) still seems reasonable to me (even though it seems to be mostly working around the underlying issue).