| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
Noteable changes besides the npm update should be 671e64a, 3806d87 and 671e64a...626432d. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
LGTM |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Tangentially related - would it be okay to transliterate Russian names? Or is this super sensitive? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@piscisaureus there was conversation about that in #1927, but I don't think a decision was reached. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@piscisaureus It would be ok from my side. If you do that, you can use «Nikita Skovoroda» (first and last name correspondingly). The current variant was copied from my git settings and/or GitHub user profile. Previous discussion here: #1927. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Could we also add this to release? #1982 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
that'll have to go in to .mailmap to make it happen @piscisaureus and @ChALkeR |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@bricss That one is not finished yet and has an alternate version in #1998. It requires further discussion and there is no need to delay v2.3.1 release for that, v2.3.1 fixes more serious bugs. #1982/#1998 atm fixes one module using the API in an incorrect and undocumented way (the other one got patched already, there might be more, but I know of only two for sure). I would recommend fixing your problem by merging dtabuenc/karma-html-reporter#27 instead, if you want a fix asap. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@bricss, This is not the correct place to discuss which of #1998 and #1982 should be merged. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@piscisaureus, @rvagg, @brendanashworth If the question on how you should write my name is holding the release, just remove those two commits from the above list and put them in some later release when a consensus is reached. Those two commits are insignificant, they target the documentation only. 3806d87 is strictly speaking a security fix and should not be delayed, |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
«Nikita Skovoroda» sounds pretty good. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Updated the commit list in the OP. @rvagg lmk if you're able to get this out today, otherwise I'll see about doing it later today. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@Fishrock123 This should not be released as-is with the updated commit list. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@chrisdickinson thoughts on branching to get a 2.3.1 out? I have no problem with it but perhaps there's something special we need to be considering here? @Fishrock123 @ChALkeR also an option is forcing a commit in there and forcing a rebase of everything that's in after and have their shas change. I also don't have a great problem with that but then again I'm a git cowboy. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
... and sorry for being tardy with this, I said I'd release this yesterday but didn't so this is my fault. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
there's only these 3 that would be changed, so perhaps not a big deal? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Now also:
Imma do a release and force push before any more commits land. Stop me now if you think this is a terrible idea! CI @ 061342a https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/54/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I've not been following this closely, but it seems #2011 or #2013 should land for the windows path fix to really be complete. cc @Fishrock123 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I was going on this:
Is that not your reading @silverwind? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
What is happenning now with 2.3.1 brings up a question: why are current patch releases based on the master branch? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
FYI I've opted to sit on this while we further investigate the zlib bug (wasted a chunk of my afternoon doing so!), should get a release out tomorrow, @Fishrock123 || @chrisdickinson are welcome to get this out if they feel the need when they're around before I show up. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
bug reports
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
My computer is currently out of service so I'm afraid there's not much I can do to help. :/ Edit: got it working again for a while.. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Looks like we are too late on this now, we should not put this out until Monday. ((Weekend)) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
agree on putting it off till the end of the weekend, I'm happy to take on board the suggestion to avoid releasing just before or during a weekend to make it easier for people who work in this area as a day-job and don't want weekend drama |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
This is the Notable Changes I'm going with, critique welcome.
@targos could you take a look at these since they are mainly yours? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
You're right @ChALkeR, I was mixing up require() speedups, thanks |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
#2013 is landed CI @ https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/66/ Running smoke tests (again) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
For the zlib bug, it is incorrect. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@targos thanks! What I actually meant to refer to was "buffering" vs "streaming", not "sync" vs "async". I've been tinkering with this bug and so far I'm unable to trigger it under any streaming situation but I'd love to hear if you have different results on this. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
OK, I'm not going to move forward with this release and going to bed instead. There are crypto errors on Windows 2008 that are beyond the random timeouts we might expect. Also, only a few of them are failing with a duration of 60 seconds (the timeout length), so there's something more sinister going on here. @shigeki could this be to do with the headers work, and/or the CNNIC whitelist cert check? /cc @nodejs/crypto not ok 422 - test-https-foafssl.js
---
duration_ms: 60.178
not ok 675 - test-tls-alert.js
---
duration_ms: 60.177
...
not ok 698 - test-tls-dhe.js
---
duration_ms: 60.173
...
not ok 699 - test-tls-ecdh.js
#c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-ecdh.js:40
# if (err) throw err;
# ^
#Error: Command failed: C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /s /c ""c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\Release\openssl-cli.exe" s_client -cipher -ALL:ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA -connect 127.0.0.1:12346"
#WARNING: can't open config file: /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
#Loading 'screen' into random state -
# at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:196:12)
# at emitTwo (events.js:87:13)
# at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:172:7)
# at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:764:16)
# at Socket.<anonymous> (internal/child_process.js:319:11)
# at emitOne (events.js:77:13)
# at Socket.emit (events.js:169:7)
# at Pipe._onclose (net.js:467:12)
---
duration_ms: 0.496
...
not ok 700 - test-tls-ecdh-disable.js
#
#assert.js:89
# throw new assert.AssertionError({
# ^
#AssertionError: -1 != -1
# at c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-ecdh-disable.js:39:12
# at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:203:5)
# at emitTwo (events.js:87:13)
# at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:172:7)
# at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:764:16)
# at Socket.<anonymous> (internal/child_process.js:319:11)
# at emitOne (events.js:77:13)
# at Socket.emit (events.js:169:7)
# at Pipe._onclose (net.js:467:12)
---
duration_ms: 0.499
...
not ok 719 - test-tls-no-sslv3.js
#WARNING: can't open config file: /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
#Loading 'screen' into random state -
#assert.js:89
# throw new assert.AssertionError({
# ^
#AssertionError: 3221226505 == 1
# at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-no-sslv3.js:34:12)
# at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\common.js:367:15)
# at ChildProcess.g (events.js:260:16)
# at emitTwo (events.js:87:13)
# at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:172:7)
# at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:200:12)
---
duration_ms: 0.499
...
not ok 730 - test-tls-securepair-server.js
#
#assert.js:89
# throw new assert.AssertionError({
# ^
#AssertionError: 1 == 0
# at process.<anonymous> (c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-securepair-server.js:127:10)
# at emitOne (events.js:82:20)
# at process.emit (events.js:169:7)
---
duration_ms: 0.496
...
not ok 732 - test-tls-session-cache.js
#done
#
#assert.js:89
# throw new assert.AssertionError({
# ^
#AssertionError: 3221226505 == 0
# at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-session-cache.js:92:14)
# at emitTwo (events.js:87:13)
# at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:172:7)
# at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:200:12)
---
duration_ms: 0.495
...
not ok 733 - test-tls-set-ciphers.js
#c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\test\parallel\test-tls-set-ciphers.js:44
# if (err) throw err;
# ^
#Error: Command failed: C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /s /c ""c:\workspace\iojs+pr+win\nodes\win2008r2\Release\openssl-cli.exe" s_client -cipher RC4-MD5 -connect 127.0.0.1:12346"
#WARNING: can't open config file: /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
#Loading 'screen' into random state -
# at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:196:12)
# at emitTwo (events.js:87:13)
# at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:172:7)
# at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:764:16)
# at Socket.<anonymous> (internal/child_process.js:319:11)
# at emitOne (events.js:77:13)
# at Socket.emit (events.js:169:7)
# at Pipe._onclose (net.js:467:12)
---
duration_ms: 0.497
...
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+pr+win/53/nodes=win2008r2/ is the failing machine, all other slaves are OK, including the Windows 2012 one. Kicking off another one before I head off: https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/67/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@rvagg hmm, new CI doesn't have those. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Let's try again then https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/68/ I'm still concerned with those failures but I have zero to go on so if anyone has any clues then please fill us in. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
smoke testing, I've been tuning my smoke test suite and it's coming along nicely! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
success on most fronts, the outstanding smoke test I still can't make play nicely is npm, details here: npm/npm#8648 pushing ahead with release |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #1996 Notable changes * module: The number of syscalls made during a require() have been significantly reduced again (see #1801 from v2.2.0 for previous work), which should lead to a performance improvement (Pierre Inglebert) #1920. * npm: - Upgrade to v2.11.2 (Rebecca Turner) #1956. - Upgrade to v2.11.3 (Forrest L Norvell) #2018. * zlib: A bug was discovered where the process would abort if the final part of a zlib decompression results in a buffer that would exceed the maximum length of 0x3fffffff bytes (~1GiB). This was likely to only occur during buffered decompression (rather than streaming). This is now fixed and will instead result in a thrown RangeError (Michaël Zasso) #1811.
PR-URL: #1996 Notable changes * module: The number of syscalls made during a require() have been significantly reduced again (see #1801 from v2.2.0 for previous work), which should lead to a performance improvement (Pierre Inglebert) #1920. * npm: - Upgrade to v2.11.2 (Rebecca Turner) #1956. - Upgrade to v2.11.3 (Forrest L Norvell) #2018. * zlib: A bug was discovered where the process would abort if the final part of a zlib decompression results in a buffer that would exceed the maximum length of 0x3fffffff bytes (~1GiB). This was likely to only occur during buffered decompression (rather than streaming). This is now fixed and will instead result in a thrown RangeError (Michaël Zasso) #1811.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
done, https://iojs.org/dist/latest/ armv6 taking its time as usual, will promote later |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Armv6 is up. 🍻 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL #70 Related: nodejs/node#1996 Signed-off-by: Hans Kristian Flaatten <hans.kristian.flaatten@turistforeningen.no>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
As pointed out by @silverwind, 671e64a contains an important fix for Windows users that we should get out ASAP. Let me know if there objections to a 24-hour window for this, I figure that a patch release with a limited list of commits should be straightforward.