doc: update package.json field definitions - #35741
Conversation
Sorry, something went wrong.
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together.
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks for looking into this. Agreed these are experimental right now. Whether this lands should depend on whether we are able to move to considering the modules implementation in general as stable at this point, as per discussion at the meeting today. I just checked my numbers wrt to the usage of these fields, and out of the 1.4 million packages on npm, the numbers for packages using these fields are:
If we were to consider the modules implementation stable, then given the above I don't think we could also consider exports or type experimental, as this is major stable usage in the wild now. I don't have usage numbers on exports patterns for example, but I expect it would still be low like imports. So I feel that only these specific features of "exports" or "imports" might still fit the definition of subfeatures with experimental status if we were to move the entire implementation stable. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
DerekNonGeneric
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👏👏👏
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together. PR-URL: #35741 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
|
I thought we weren’t going to reorder "main"? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together. PR-URL: #35741 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together. PR-URL: #35741 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together. PR-URL: #35741 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental features together. PR-URL: #35741 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Only imports has the experimental status right now but technically all
ESM related features are currently experimental. The list also doesn't
appear to be in any specific order so I've grouped the experimental
features together.
Checklist