tools: improve error detection in find-inactive-collaborators - #39617
Closed
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
tools: improve error detection in find-inactive-collaborators#39617Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Previously, if the script failed to find a collaborator section in the README file, it would carry on with no results and no error. This detects the problem and throws an error. It is also more robust in that it will still work if the emeriti section ends up getting moved and does not immedaitely follow the collaborator section.
lpinca
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2021
benjamingr
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2021
jasnell
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2021
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 3, 2021
Previously, if the script failed to find a collaborator section in the README file, it would carry on with no results and no error. This detects the problem and throws an error. It is also more robust in that it will still work if the emeriti section ends up getting moved and does not immedaitely follow the collaborator section. PR-URL: #39617 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2021
Previously, if the script failed to find a collaborator section in the README file, it would carry on with no results and no error. This detects the problem and throws an error. It is also more robust in that it will still work if the emeriti section ends up getting moved and does not immedaitely follow the collaborator section. PR-URL: #39617 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2021
Previously, if the script failed to find a collaborator section in the README file, it would carry on with no results and no error. This detects the problem and throws an error. It is also more robust in that it will still work if the emeriti section ends up getting moved and does not immedaitely follow the collaborator section. PR-URL: #39617 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, if the script failed to find a collaborator section in the
README file, it would carry on with no results and no error. This
detects the problem and throws an error.
It is also more robust in that it will still work if the emeriti section
ends up getting moved and does not immedaitely follow the collaborator
section.