test: fix 'checks' validation test for checkPrime - #47139
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intoMar 19, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
This test had two problems: * The first argument was a number in both cases, which is what caused the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error -- the validity of the 'checks' option was not actually verified at all. Thus, the first argument should be valid for this particular test. * The function returned by common.mustNotCall() was passed to assert.throws() as a third argument instead of being passed to checkPrime() as a third argument. (Isn't JavaScript great?) This again led to the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error, but again, the validity of the 'checks' option was not verified. Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the 'checks' option are valid. Refs: nodejs#36997
This comment was marked as outdated.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
panva
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
23 tasks
19 tasks
This was referenced Mar 20, 2023
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2023
This test had two problems: * The first argument was a number in both cases, which is what caused the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error -- the validity of the 'checks' option was not actually verified at all. Thus, the first argument should be valid for this particular test. * The function returned by common.mustNotCall() was passed to assert.throws() as a third argument instead of being passed to checkPrime() as a third argument. (Isn't JavaScript great?) This again led to the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error, but again, the validity of the 'checks' option was not verified. Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the 'checks' option are valid. Refs: #36997 PR-URL: #47139 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Merged
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2023
This test had two problems: * The first argument was a number in both cases, which is what caused the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error -- the validity of the 'checks' option was not actually verified at all. Thus, the first argument should be valid for this particular test. * The function returned by common.mustNotCall() was passed to assert.throws() as a third argument instead of being passed to checkPrime() as a third argument. (Isn't JavaScript great?) This again led to the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error, but again, the validity of the 'checks' option was not verified. Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the 'checks' option are valid. Refs: #36997 PR-URL: #47139 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2023
This test had two problems: * The first argument was a number in both cases, which is what caused the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error -- the validity of the 'checks' option was not actually verified at all. Thus, the first argument should be valid for this particular test. * The function returned by common.mustNotCall() was passed to assert.throws() as a third argument instead of being passed to checkPrime() as a third argument. (Isn't JavaScript great?) This again led to the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error, but again, the validity of the 'checks' option was not verified. Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the 'checks' option are valid. Refs: #36997 PR-URL: #47139 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test had two problems:
Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the checks option are valid.
Refs: #36997