crypto: unify validation of checkPrime checks - #47165
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intoMar 22, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2023
This comment was marked as outdated.
17 tasks
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2023
Comment thread
test/parallel/test-crypto-prime.js
Outdated
This comment was marked as outdated.
Previously, the JS layer would validate that the value of the 'checks' option was an unsigned 32-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error but with a slightly misleading error message. Then the C++ layer would validate that the value was an unsigned 31-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error, but with a different (and even less helpful) error message. Instead, make the JS layer aware of the 31-bit restriction so that no validation in C++ is necessary and so that the error message always matches the exact requirement.
tniessen
force-pushed
the
crypto-unify-checkprime-checks-range-check
branch
from
c96994b to
e2a709b
Compare
March 20, 2023 13:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
This was referenced Mar 21, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
33 tasks
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2023
Previously, the JS layer would validate that the value of the 'checks' option was an unsigned 32-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error but with a slightly misleading error message. Then the C++ layer would validate that the value was an unsigned 31-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error, but with a different (and even less helpful) error message. Instead, make the JS layer aware of the 31-bit restriction so that no validation in C++ is necessary and so that the error message always matches the exact requirement. PR-URL: #47165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Merged
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2023
Previously, the JS layer would validate that the value of the 'checks' option was an unsigned 32-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error but with a slightly misleading error message. Then the C++ layer would validate that the value was an unsigned 31-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error, but with a different (and even less helpful) error message. Instead, make the JS layer aware of the 31-bit restriction so that no validation in C++ is necessary and so that the error message always matches the exact requirement. PR-URL: #47165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2023
Previously, the JS layer would validate that the value of the 'checks' option was an unsigned 32-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error but with a slightly misleading error message. Then the C++ layer would validate that the value was an unsigned 31-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error, but with a different (and even less helpful) error message. Instead, make the JS layer aware of the 31-bit restriction so that no validation in C++ is necessary and so that the error message always matches the exact requirement. PR-URL: #47165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, the JS layer would validate that the value of the checks option was an unsigned 32-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error but with a slightly misleading error message. Then the C++ layer would validate that the value was an unsigned 31-bit integer, otherwise throwing an appropriate error, but with a different (and even less helpful) error message.
Instead, make the JS layer aware of the 31-bit restriction so that no validation in C++ is necessary and so that the error message always matches the exact requirement.