FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

lib: Remove unnecessary TODO comments by pgeiss · Pull Request #4719 · nodejs/node · GitHub

/ node Public

lib: Remove unnecessary TODO comments - #4719

Closed
pgeiss wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
pgeiss:remove_unnecessary_TODO
Closed

lib: Remove unnecessary TODO comments#4719
pgeiss wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
pgeiss:remove_unnecessary_TODO

Conversation

pgeiss commented Jan 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Original committer (@trevnorris) stated they were safe to remove in issue comments.
Ref: Issue #4642

PS: I want to work more on the TODOs in 4642 (and, you know, actually fix things). I'm assuming I should direct questions if I have any there? It has a 'mentor-available' tag.

mscdex added the buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. label Jan 16, 2016

Trott commented Jan 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

The mentor who is available is probably @Fishrock123. (I'm inferring this from the fact that he's the one that added the mentor-available tag.) But yes, directing questions about #4642 to that actual issue is definitely the thing to do. I'm happy to help too, at least on areas of the code where I feel comfortable. And there are probably others too. If you want to try as many venues as possible, you can also try asking in the #node-dev IRC channel.

Original committer stated they were safe to remove in issue post.
Ref: Issue nodejs#4642
pgeiss force-pushed the remove_unnecessary_TODO branch from a68df69 to 22f28a2 Compare January 16, 2016 19:52

pgeiss commented Jan 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rebased on latest master.

cjihrig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2016
Refs: #4642
PR-URL: #4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>

cjihrig commented Jan 17, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks! Landed in 83d2b77. A full CI run isn't necessary for removing a few comments, but I did run the tests locally as a sanity check.

cjihrig closed this Jan 17, 2016

rvagg commented Jan 18, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for finding a place to contribute @pgeiss, it looks like this is your first commit in core, if so, welcome on board! I hope you can find other places to make an impact.

evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2016
Refs: #4642
PR-URL: #4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2016
Refs: #4642
PR-URL: #4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
Refs: #4642
PR-URL: #4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
Refs: nodejs#4642
PR-URL: nodejs#4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
Refs: nodejs#4642
PR-URL: nodejs#4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2016
Refs: nodejs#4642
PR-URL: nodejs#4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
scovetta pushed a commit to scovetta/node that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2016
Refs: nodejs#4642
PR-URL: nodejs#4719
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL