FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Change contextvars C API to use PyObject · Issue #78943 · python/cpython · GitHub

Repository navigation

Change contextvars C API to use PyObject #78943

Closed

Description

BPO 34762
Nosy @gvanrossum, @rhettinger, @scoder, @vstinner, @ned-deily, @ericsnowcurrently, @serhiy-storchaka, @1st1, @miss-islington
PRs
  • bpo-34762: Fix contextvars C API to use PyObject* pointer types. #9473
  • [3.7] bpo-34762: Fix contextvars C API to use PyObject* pointer types. (GH-9473) #9478
  • bpo-34762: Update PyContext* refs to PyObject* in asyncio and decimal #9609
  • [3.7] bpo-34762: Update PyContext* refs to PyObject* in asyncio and decimal #9610
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2018-09-27.19:35:15.549>
    created_at = <Date 2018-09-21.15:06:32.391>
    labels = ['interpreter-core', '3.8', 'type-feature', '3.7']
    title = 'Change contextvars C API to use PyObject'
    updated_at = <Date 2018-09-27.19:35:15.547>
    user = 'https://github.com/1st1'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2018-09-27.19:35:15.547>
    actor = 'yselivanov'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2018-09-27.19:35:15.549>
    closer = 'yselivanov'
    components = ['Interpreter Core']
    creation = <Date 2018-09-21.15:06:32.391>
    creator = 'yselivanov'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 34762
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 20.0
    messages = ['325989', '325990', '325991', '325993', '325999', '326000', '326002', '326003', '326004', '326007', '326009', '326022', '326025', '326027', '326028', '326574', '326575', '326582', '326585', '326586']
    nosy_count = 9.0
    nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'rhettinger', 'scoder', 'vstinner', 'ned.deily', 'eric.snow', 'serhiy.storchaka', 'yselivanov', 'miss-islington']
    pr_nums = ['9473', '9478', '9609', '9610']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue34762'
    versions = ['Python 3.7', 'Python 3.8']

    Activity

    1. 1st1 commented on Sep 21, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      Unfortunately, the current C API for PEP-567 has a flaw: it uses non-PyObject pointers.

      This causes problems with integrating with tools like Cython, where PyObject is special and a lot of machinery recognizes it and manages refcounts correctly.

      It also goes against the recent push to improve C API; one of the things we want to fix is to eliminate non-PyObject pointer types from public APIs entirely.

      Because this C API is new (landed in 3.7.0) I think it might make sense to change it in 3.7.1. I *think* this is a relatively safe (albeit annoying) change:

      1. I don't expect that a lot of people use this new C API. I googled recently if anyone uses contextvars at all, and found that some people are using the Python API. The only user of C API that I'm aware of is uvloop, which I'll be happy to fix.

      2. My current understanding is that this change won't break existing extensions compiled against Python 3.7.0, as it's just a change in pointers' types.

      3. For example, clang spits out the following *warning* if it sees mismatched pointer types (and still compiles the extension):

        warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'PyContextVar *' (aka
        'struct _pycontextvarobject *') to parameter of type 'PyObject *' (aka 'struct _object *')
        [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]

      4. This would make it slightly harder to create extension that supports both 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 and compiles without warnings. (It's possible to avoid warnings by adding some #ifdefs macro).

      If we don't change this API now, we'll likely have to either live with it, or face a very slow deprecation period.

    2. 1st1 commented on Sep 21, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      Just to add to this issue: I originally realized that something is wrong with the design when we had a super hard to track memory leak in uvloop, caused by Cython being unable to automatically manage increfs/decrefs for PyContext* pointers. So I do believe this is a serious pitfall.

      Adding Guido to the nosy list as he accepted the PEP and IMO still has a say in this.

    3. vstinner commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Member

      IMHO it's not too late to change the public C API in Python 3.7.1, since it's a very new API, I don't expect many users, and I only expect compiler warnings nor hard error if existing code pass PyContextVar* instead of PyObject*.

      I agree that it's way better to use PyObject* rather than specific PyContextVar*. The C API should not leak implementation details ;-)

    4. gvanrossum commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Member

      Let’s change it ASAP. It’s still up to Ned whether to hold up 3.7.1, if he
      won’t it should go into 3.7.2.

      On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:28 AM STINNER Victor <report@bugs.python.org>
      wrote:

      STINNER Victor <vstinner@redhat.com> added the comment:

      IMHO it's not too late to change the public C API in Python 3.7.1, since
      it's a very new API, I don't expect many users, and I only expect compiler
      warnings nor hard error if existing code pass PyContextVar* instead of
      PyObject*.

      I agree that it's way better to use PyObject* rather than specific
      PyContextVar*. The C API should not leak implementation details ;-)

      ----------
      nosy: +vstinner


      Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
      <https://bugs.python.org/issue34762\>


      --
      --Guido (mobile)

    5. rhettinger commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Contributor

      I concur that the sooner the change is applied, the better it will be for everyone. We'll need to make a prominent notice in the release notes though.

    6. vstinner commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Member

      We'll need to make a prominent notice in the release notes though.

      Something can be added at:
      https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.7.html#notable-changes-in-python-3-7-1

    7. 1st1 commented on Sep 21, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      > We'll need to make a prominent notice in the release notes though.

      Something can be added at:
      https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.7.html#notable-changes-in-python-3-7-1

      Yeah, thank you for suggestion, I'll do that. I'll also update the PEP, docs in other places, and try to spread the word.

      Now I'm just waiting for Ned to confirm if this goes into 3.7.1 or 3.7.2. It's his say.

    8. ericsnowcurrently commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Member

      one of the things we want to fix is to eliminate non-PyObject
      pointer types from public APIs entirely.

      A notable exception is Py_buffer. [1] As well, cross-interpreter data must not be PyObject, though that isn't much of an issue (yet). :) At some point it may make sense to make _PyCrossInterpreterData [2] part of the public C-API. However, we can cross *that* bridge later. :)

      Using PyObject for contextvars makes sense (for the reasons you described) as long as they won't be shared between interpreters. I'm not super familiar with the contextvars C-API, but it looks like cross-interpreter issues are *not* a factor. If that's the case then there's nothing further to discuss. :)

      [1] https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/buffer.html#buffer-structure
      [2] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Include/internal/pystate.h#L137

    9. 1st1 commented on Sep 21, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      > one of the things we want to fix is to eliminate non-PyObject
      pointer types from public APIs entirely.

      A notable exception is Py_buffer. [1]

      Right, because Py_buffer isn't a PyObject at all :)

      Using PyObject for contextvars makes sense (for the reasons you described) as long as they won't be shared between interpreters.

      Yeah, PyContext, PyContextVar, and PyContextToken aren't supposed to be shared between sub-interpreters directly. Context is essentially a mapping of Context Variables to arbitrary Python Objects, so sharing it transparently isn't possible.

    10. scoder commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Contributor

      because Py_buffer isn't a PyObject at all :)

      It owns a PyObject reference to the buffer owner, though.

    11. ned-deily commented on Sep 21, 2018

      Member

      Since we've already delayed 3.7.1rc cutoff for a few days, let's get it into 3.7.1 if you have the time, Yury.

    12. 1st1 commented on Sep 21, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      New changeset 2ec872b by Yury Selivanov in branch 'master':
      bpo-34762: Fix contextvars C API to use PyObject* pointer types. (GH-9473)
      2ec872b

    13. 3 remaining items

    14. serhiy-storchaka commented on Sep 27, 2018

      Member

      Perhaps this change caused new compiler warnings:

      In file included from ./Include/pytime.h:6:0,
                       from ./Include/Python.h:68,
                       from /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_asynciomodule.c:1:
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_asynciomodule.c: In function ‘_asyncio_Task___init___impl’:
      ./Include/object.h:895:14: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
               (op) = (op2);                           \
                    ^
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_asynciomodule.c:1954:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘Py_XSETREF’
           Py_XSETREF(self->task_context, PyContext_CopyCurrent());
           ^~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c: In function ‘init_current_context’:
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:1503:44: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘PyContextVar_Set’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           PyContextToken *tok = PyContextVar_Set(current_context_var, tl_context);
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      In file included from ./Include/Python.h:116:0,
                       from /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:29:
      ./Include/context.h:63:24: note: expected ‘PyObject * {aka struct _object *}’ but argument is of type ‘PyContextVar * {aka struct _pycontextvarobject *}’
       PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) PyContextVar_Set(PyObject *var, PyObject *value);
                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:1503:27: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           PyContextToken *tok = PyContextVar_Set(current_context_var, tl_context);
                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c: In function ‘current_context’:
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:1517:26: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘PyContextVar_Get’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           if (PyContextVar_Get(current_context_var, NULL, &tl_context) < 0) {
                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      In file included from ./Include/Python.h:116:0,
                       from /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:29:
      ./Include/context.h:56:17: note: expected ‘PyObject * {aka struct _object *}’ but argument is of type ‘PyContextVar * {aka struct _pycontextvarobject *}’
       PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyContextVar_Get(
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c: In function ‘PyDec_SetCurrentContext’:
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:1564:44: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘PyContextVar_Set’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           PyContextToken *tok = PyContextVar_Set(current_context_var, v);
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      In file included from ./Include/Python.h:116:0,
                       from /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:29:
      ./Include/context.h:63:24: note: expected ‘PyObject * {aka struct _object *}’ but argument is of type ‘PyContextVar * {aka struct _pycontextvarobject *}’
       PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) PyContextVar_Set(PyObject *var, PyObject *value);
                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:1564:27: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           PyContextToken *tok = PyContextVar_Set(current_context_var, v);
                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c: In function ‘PyInit__decimal’:
      /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/_decimal.c:5542:25: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           current_context_var = PyContextVar_New("decimal_context", NULL);
                               ^
    15. 1st1 commented on Sep 27, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      Right, I'll make a PR.

    16. 1st1 commented on Sep 27, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      New changeset 994269c by Yury Selivanov in branch 'master':
      bpo-34762: Update PyContext* to PyObject* in asyncio and decimal (GH-9609)
      994269c

    17. 1st1 commented on Sep 27, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      New changeset 24cb7de by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.7':
      [3.7] bpo-34762: Update PyContext* refs to PyObject* in asyncio and decimal (GH-9610)
      24cb7de

    18. 1st1 commented on Sep 27, 2018

      MemberAuthor

      Thank you Serhiy, for re-opening this! I've pushed fixes to 3.7 and master branches.

    19. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    20. added 3 commits that reference this issue on Sep 28, 2024
    21. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 12, 2024
    22. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 12, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      3.7 (EOL)end of life3.8 (EOL)end of lifeinterpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)type-featureA feature request or enhancement

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions


        Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL