Oh, come on, why must argclinic raise an error here? That isn't useful:

ValueError: _path_splitroot_ex: embedded null character in p

_path_splitroot_ex: embedded null character in p

Oh right, I forgot about this behaviour of argument clinic 😞 Might be a good reason to go to unicode after all.

Alternatively, you could handle the ValueError in the Python wrapper, split at the null, and then append it back onto the last element? Strictly speaking we're in the "invalid path --> invalid output" place again, as we don't actually support embedded nulls in paths at all, but there's no reason we need to go ahead and raise the error this early.

It might just be my laptop or because I'm comparing with 3.12. (there doesn't seem to be a way to have 2 builds at the same time)
Otherwise we need to check what's different from your implementation. (if you haven't lost it, of course)

OK, how's the build going?

It might just be my laptop or because I'm comparing with 3.12. (there doesn't seem to be a way to have 2 builds at the same time)

You can use worktrees. Anyway, I still have my implementation, but there's no need to delve further into the comparison because the reason is obvious. I was testing the builtin function directly, not a wrapper function that called os.fspath() before calling the builtin. My plan was to switch to using path_t internally instead of a wrapper, but I never implemented that. Here's the performance I get for your PR with and without the wrapper.

> .\python_work -m timeit -s "import os" "os.path.splitroot('//server/share/spam/eggs')"
1000000 loops, best of 5: 270 nsec per loop

> .\python_work -m timeit -s "import nt" "nt._path_splitroot_ex('//server/share/spam/eggs')"
2000000 loops, best of 5: 153 nsec per loop

It's 1.76 times faster without the wrapper.

You can use worktrees.

Could you explain how I can use them?

I was testing the builtin function directly, not a wrapper function

Yeah, that matches the performance when I used path_t before. But I switched back to using a Python wrapper because NULL bytes and surrogates weren't handled properly. The code was quite ugly too with having to convert the input path to bytes on Unix.

I tried to work around the first issue by modifying path_converter, but I couldn't get surrogates to work, so I abandoned that idea and went for a simpler implementation.

Here's a brief overview of worktrees in the developer's guide:

https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/git-boot-camp/#git-worktree

I tried to work around the first issue by modifying path_converter, but I couldn't get surrogates to work, so I abandoned that idea and went for a simpler implementation.

In another issue, the implementation of path_t could be generalized to support fields to configure the converter to use wide regardless of platform, to allow null characters, to allow arbitrary length paths (e.g. no 32767 length limit on Windows), and a new field such as bytes_input to determine whether a path result has to be converted back to bytes. The option to always use a wide-character path is a generalization of the current behavior on Windows. Argument Clinic would be extended to support the new options. The implementations of _path_splitroot_ex(), _path_normpath(), and _path_abspath() (if adopted) would benefit, and also the _path_is*() helpers on Windows.

Let's leave path_t for a followup pull request, such that it can be implemented without a Python wrapper.

That's quorum, thanks @nineteendo for bearing with us, and congrats on landing the patch!

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot iOS ARM64 Simulator 3.x has failed when building commit 10bb90e.

What do you need to do:

1. Don't panic.
2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/1380/builds/87) and take a look at the build logs.
4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (10bb90e) or if it is a false positive.
5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/1380/builds/87

Failed tests:

• test_os

Failed subtests:

• test_fpathconf - test.test_os.TestInvalidFD.test_fpathconf

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/buildbot/Library/Developer/XCTestDevices/46780DAB-3371-45CA-A1E6-5178548A2DAA/data/Containers/Bundle/Application/2E63ACC7-4F0C-40C2-B867-2CAE5EAFD03D/iOSTestbed.app/python/lib/python3.13/test/test_os.py", line 2369, in test_fpathconf
    self.check(os.pathconf, "PC_NAME_MAX")
    ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/buildbot/Library/Developer/XCTestDevices/46780DAB-3371-45CA-A1E6-5178548A2DAA/data/Containers/Bundle/Application/2E63ACC7-4F0C-40C2-B867-2CAE5EAFD03D/iOSTestbed.app/python/lib/python3.13/test/test_os.py", line 2293, in check
    f(os_helper.make_bad_fd(), *args, **kwargs)
    ~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ValueError: unrecognized configuration name

Hmm, it didn't fail in the previous commit: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/1380/builds/86
Is this random?

This seems unrelated, and if it's only iOS, then we can ignore it. That buildbot has only just started running, and will be flushing out random issues for a little while.

Eryk, can we backport this to 3.12 to fix the bug with ntpath.normpath()?

GH-119394 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

Please add a unittest coverage of both the Python and C versions so that we ensure their behavior is the same.

@gpshead, they both get tested as long as tests run on at least one POSIX system and one Windows system. The Python fallback implementation is only defined if the C version can't be imported. Thus the fallback for ntpath.splitroot() is only defined on POSIX, and the fallback for posixpath.splitroot() is only defined on Windows.

Is this intentional? Does it need addressing before 3.13.0 in two weeks?

I would prefer to address this, because:

• It can break a user's code that used: os.path.splitroot(p="...")
• It changes the typeshed typings, basically it makes the first param implicitly pos-only, because you cannot be sure which name it has: p or path

I will open a PR in a moment.