Repository navigation
bpo-29587: Add another test for the gen.throw() exception chain fix - #19859
Merged
cjerdonek merged 1 commit intoMay 17, 2020
Merged
cjerdonek merged 1 commit into
cjerdonek merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
|
I've skipped the NEWS entry since this adds to an issue that already has a NEWS entry. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
cjerdonek
force-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
from
aa3ff76 to
649401d
Compare
May 3, 2020 07:13
cjerdonek
force-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
from
649401d to
b4cf70f
Compare
May 8, 2020 09:24
cjerdonek
force-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
2 times, most recently
from
baed425 to
dd6f901
Compare
May 17, 2020 02:14
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR just adds another failing test for bpo-29587 (following the fix in PR #19823). It tests something slightly different. I confirmed that the test fails prior to PR #19823.
https://bugs.python.org/issue29587