FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

bpo-43933: Set frame.f_lineno during call to __exit__ by markshannon · Pull Request #25719 · python/cpython · GitHub

  1. python
  2. cpython

Repository navigation

bpo-43933: Set frame.f_lineno during call to __exit__ - #25719

Merged
markshannon merged 3 commits into
python:masterfrom
markshannon:line-number-for-with-exit
Apr 30, 2021
ConversationCommits (3)ChecksFiles changed
Merged

bpo-43933: Set frame.f_lineno during call to __exit__#25719
markshannon merged 3 commits into
python:masterfrom
markshannon:line-number-for-with-exit

Conversation

markshannon commented Apr 29, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sets the line number for the call to __exit__ when leaving a with statement to the line number of the with statement.

https://bugs.python.org/issue43933

markshannon force-pushed the line-number-for-with-exit branch from ba32a52 to d22409e Compare April 29, 2021 13:04

encukou commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "Check if generated files are up to date" test is failing because of unfortunate timing when merging other PRs (GH-25315, GH-25687).
It's OK to ignore it. Sorry for the inconvenience.

markshannon reopened this Apr 29, 2021

markshannon commented Apr 30, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

3.10b1 is imminent, and no one has objected.
So, I'm merging this.

markshannon merged commit 5979e81 into python:master Apr 30, 2021
markshannon deleted the line-number-for-with-exit branch May 4, 2021 09:00
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
4a682d8 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
9c31e41 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
9438962 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
6b6fbfd 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
3989f8f 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
postgres-mirror pushed a commit to postgres/postgres that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
1a2752b 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
mrdrivingduck pushed a commit to mrdrivingduck/PolarDB-for-PostgreSQL that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
7e7f2e9 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
mrdrivingduck pushed a commit to polardb/PolarDB-for-PostgreSQL that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
a5cd81b 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
574b668 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
0cadaa6 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
945f533 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
363757e 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
daad3aa 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
zeekay pushed a commit to hanzoai/sql that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
2c4d1c4 
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
  -  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
  -    s.__exit__(None, None, None)
  +  PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
  +    with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.

(See python/cpython#25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)

Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL