FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Skip 3.12-dev pending Greenlet support by hugovk · Pull Request #259 · python/pyperformance · GitHub

Repository navigation

Skip 3.12-dev pending Greenlet support - #259

Closed
hugovk wants to merge 4 commits into
python:mainfrom
hugovk:ci-update
Closed

hugovk wants to merge 4 commits into
python:mainfrom
hugovk:ci-update

Conversation

hugovk commented Jan 11, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

At the moment the 3.12-dev builds are failing, causing every build to show as failed.

It's failing because Greenlet doesn't yet support 3.12. The tracking issue is at python-greenlet/greenlet#323 and there's a PR at python-greenlet/greenlet#327 but it's not ready yet.

In the meantime, we can mark 3.12-dev as "experimental", so whilst the individual job still fails, it doesn't mark the whole build as failed.

Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idcontinue-on-error


Also bump GitHub Actions, allow building feature branches, and we can fold the PyPy config into the main list. workflow_dispatch adds a button to the UI to be able to trigger new builds, occasionally useful.


Shall we also remove pypy3.7? The newest PyPy only supports 3.8 and 3.9:

This comment was marked as outdated.

hugovk marked this pull request as draft January 12, 2023 07:31
hugovk changed the title Allow 3.12-dev to fail pending Greenlet support Skip 3.12-dev pending Greenlet support Jan 15, 2023

hugovk commented Jan 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Need to research more about how continue-on-error works, for now I think it's fine to remove the failing 3.12-dev from the matrix until python-greenlet/greenlet#323 is resolved.

I also removed unsupported pypy3.7.

hugovk marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2023 16:05

hugovk commented Feb 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Please see PR #264 to replace this.

Comment on lines +21 to +22
# Skip 3.12-dev, pending https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/issues/323
python: [pypy3.8, pypy3.9, "3.7", "3.8", "3.9", "3.10", 3.11-dev]

pradyunsg Feb 5, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

If I'm understanding https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-a-matrix-for-your-jobs#handling-failures correctly, we can achieve what we want to with something like:

    continue-on-error: ${{ matrix.failure-allowed }}
    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        # Test all supported versions on Ubuntu:
        os: [ubuntu-latest]
        python: [pypy3.8, pypy3.9, "3.7", "3.8", "3.9", "3.10", 3.11-dev]
        failure-allowed: [false]
        include:
          # Also test macOS and Windows:
          - os: macos-latest
            python: "3.10"
            failure-allowed: false
          - os: windows-latest
            python: "3.10"
            failure-allowed: false
          # Also test in-development version (allowing failures):
          - os: ubuntu-latest
            python: "3.12-dev"
            failure-allowed: true

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

failure-allowed is a verb/phrase that we can change as we wish to communicate things via the variable name. The example from GitHub used experimental.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Thanks, I did try something along those lines, but wasn't successful.

Although I think #264 is a better approach? Then we'll at least see if the non-greenlet tests fail for 3.12. And when greenlet installs for 3.12, it'll start testing those too.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Looking at your force-pushed events' diffs, I don't see continue-on-error: ${{ matrix.failure-allowed }} being added at any point at the job.<id> level; which might be why they didn't work?

Regardless, they're both valid approaches to solving the problem so it's not a big deal which one we go with. :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

I also tried it in another branch:

  test:
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
    name: ${{ matrix.os }} - ${{ matrix.python }}
    continue-on-error: ${{ matrix.experimental }}
    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        # Test all supported versions on Ubuntu:
        os: [ubuntu-latest]
        python: [pypy3.7, pypy3.8, pypy3.9, "3.7", "3.8", "3.9", "3.10", 3.11-dev]
        experimental: [false]
        include:
          # Also test macOS and Windows:
          - os: macos-latest
            python: "3.10"
            experimental: false
          - os: windows-latest
            python: "3.10"
            experimental: false
          # Allow 3.12-dev to fail pending https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/issues/323
          - os: ubuntu-latest
            python: 3.12-dev
            experimental: true

Very similar to your snippet:

But still failed a PR: hugovk#3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Indeed! Thanks for clarifying! ^.^

hugovk commented Apr 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closed in favour of #274 👍

hugovk closed this Apr 20, 2023
hugovk deleted the ci-update branch April 20, 2023 22:06
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL